Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39572709›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2024

Modality-specific and modality-general representations of subjective value in frontal cortex.

Shilpa Dang, Jessica Emily Antono, Igor Kagan, Arezoo Pooresmaeili

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shilpa DangPerception and Cognition Lab, European Neuroscience Institute Goettingen - A Joint Initiative of the University Medical Center Goettingen and the Max-Planck-Society, Goettingen, Germany.
Jessica Emily AntonoPerception and Cognition Lab, European Neuroscience Institute Goettingen - A Joint Initiative of the University Medical Center Goettingen and the Max-Planck-Society, Goettingen, Germany.
Igor KaganDecision and Awareness Group, Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, German Primate Center - Leibniz Institute for Primate Research, Goettingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1814-4200
Arezoo PooresmaeiliPerception and Cognition Lab, European Neuroscience Institute Goettingen - A Joint Initiative of the University Medical Center Goettingen and the Max-Planck-Society, Goettingen, Germany. a.pooresmaeili@soton.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-4369-8838

Funding

EC | EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 | H2020 Priority Excellent Science | H2020 European Research Council (H2020 Excellent Science - European Research Council) ERC Starting Grant (no: 716846)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuroeconomics theories propose that the value associated with diverse rewards or reward-predicting stimuli is encoded along a common reference scale, irrespective of their sensory properties. However, in a dynamic environment with changing stimulus-reward pairings, the brain must also represent the sensory features of rewarding stimuli. The mechanism by which the brain balances these needs-deriving a common reference scale for valuation while maintaining sensitivity to sensory contexts-remains unclear. To investigate this, we conducted an fMRI study with human participants engaged in a dynamic foraging task, which required integrating the reward history of auditory or visual choice options and updating the subjective value for each sensory modality. Univariate fMRI analysis revealed modality-specific value representations in the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) and modality-general value representations in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC), confirmed by an exploratory multivariate pattern classification approach. Crucially, modality-specific value representations were absent when the task involved instruction-based rather than value-based choices. Effective connectivity analysis showed that modality-specific value representations emerged from selective bidirectional interactions across the auditory and visual sensory cortices, the corresponding OFC clusters, and the vmPFC. These results illustrate how the brain enables a valuation process that is sensitive to the sensory context of rewarding stimuli.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingPrefrontal CortexRewardAdultBrain MappingChoice BehaviorFemaleFrontal LobeHumansMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39572709
PMCPMC11582727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.