ArticleScientific reports2024
Influence of thermal-cycling or staining medium on the surface properties and color stability of conventional, milled, and 3D-printed base materials.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microbial Biofilm Reduces the Strength Reliability of 3D-Printed Appliance Resins.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Mechanical, biological, optical, and clinical properties of 3d-printed denture base resins: a comprehensive narrative review.Odontology · 2026Review
- Article
- The Influence of the Additive Techniques and Aging on Color Stability, Translucency, and Surface Texture of 3D-Printed Resins for Dental Restorations.Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community DentistryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The study of denture base resin fabricated by digital technology with surface properties or color stability remains limited. In this study, thermal cycling and staining media (distilled water, artificial saliva, green tea, and Coca-Cola) immersion were used to simulate the intraoral environment to assess the surface properties and color stability of CAD/CAM (milled) and 3D-printed base resin materials, the conventionally polymerized base served as the control group. After thermal cycling, all groups showed increased surface roughness, contact angle (i.e. hydrophilicity) and color difference (∆E), the 3D-printed group had the most significant increase among the 3 groups (P<0.001). While there were no significant difference (or the difference is very small) between the conventional and milled groups. After 7 and 30 days of immersion in four staining media, the ∆E values remained highest in the 3D-printed group (∆E ≥ 3.34) (P<0.001), exceeding the clinically acceptable threshold (∆E = 2.7) at 30 days. Additionally, all groups showed significantly higher ∆E values after 30 days compared to 7 days (P<0.05). The 3D-printed group exhibited a rougher surface, poorer hydrophilicity, and reduced color stability compared to the conventional or milled groups, indicating that further improvements are needed before clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.