Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39572626›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Habitat selection ecology of the aquatic beetle community using explainable machine learning.

Marek Kruk, Joanna Pakulnicka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marek KrukChair of Applied Computer Science and Mathematical Modelling, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Sloneczna 54, 10-719, Olsztyn, Poland. mkruk@uwm.edu.pl.
Joanna PakulnickaDepartment of Zoology, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Łódzki Sq. 3, 10-727, Olsztyn, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of our work is to determine the importance of habitat features for the selection of the aquatic beetle community. Insects are represented by their general ecological traits such as body size, ecological element and trophic type, which are categorised into four body size ranges, four ecological groups and four trophic types. To determine the importance of habitat selection of the studied insects, we analysed the relationships between the above categories and the set of habitat features of the lake and its surroundings. Ensemble machine learning modelling (XGBoost-SHAP) revealed the mechanism of habitat feature selection in relation to the general ecological traits. We found strong interactions between the body size, ecological element and trophic type of beetles, suggesting that these general traits control the structure and functioning of the beetle community studied. The area of the lake and the features of beetle occurrence in the aquatic environment play an important but secondary role, and the importance of the characteristics of the lake's riparian zone was minimised. We found several categories of beetles as they select the number of the same habitat features. The study can provide valuable information for the practical conservation and management of lake ecosystems.

Indexed as

ColeopteraEcosystemLakesMachine LearningAnimalsBody Size

Identifiers

PMID39572626
PMCPMC11582631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.