ArticleScientific reports2024
Effect of metagenomic next-generation sequencing on clinical outcomes in adults with severe pneumonia post-cardiac surgery: a single-center retrospective study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unveiling the Future of Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis: The Transformative Role of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing in Culture-Negative Cases.Journal of epidemiology and global health · 2025Review
- Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing in Infectious Diseases: Clinical Applications, Translational Challenges, and Future Directions.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Reports on the application of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) in adult patients with severe pneumonia after cardiac surgery remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of mNGS analysis of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) in such patients.A retrospective cohort study was conducted on adult patients with severe pneumonia after cardiac surgery. Samples were collected from patients in the surgical intensive care unit (SICU) of Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital between January 2019 and March 2024. Upon diagnosis of severe pneumonia, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid was obtained via bronchoscopy within 24 h. The mNGS group was composed of patients tested using mNGS and conventional microbiological tests. BALF was detected only by the conventional microbiological test (CMT) method in the CMT group, which involved examining bacterial and fungal smears and cultures at least. We reviewed a total of 4,064 cardiac surgeries, and based on the inclusion criteria, a total of 113 adult patients with severe pneumonia after cardiac surgery were included in this study. The overall positive rate detected by mNGS was significantly higher than that of the culture method (98% vs. 58%, P<0.0001). After receipt of the microbiological results, the mNGS group exhibited a higher incidence of antibiotic adjustments in comparison to the CMT group (P = 0.0021). After adjusting the treatment plan based on microbial testing results, the mNGS group showed an improvement in ventilator-free days within 28 days (P = 0.0475), with a shorter duration of invasive ventilation compared to the CMT group (P = 0.0208). The detection of mNGS can significantly improve the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation-II (APACHE II) score (P = 0.0161) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (P = 0.0076) on the 7th day after admission to the SICU. In this study, the mNGS group showed signs of having a positive impact on the length of stay in ICU (median: 9 days, IQR: 7-10 days vs. median: 10 days, IQR: 8-13.75 days, P = 0.0538), length of stay in Hospital (median: 20 days, IQR: 17-28 days vs. median: 25 days, IQR: 18-29 days, P = 0.1558), mortality in 28 days (19% vs. 20%, P = 0.8794), in-hospital mortality (19% vs. 22%, P = 0.7123); however, statistical analysis did not confirm these differences to be significant. mNGS could serve as a valuable complement to conventional diagnostic approaches in adult patients with severe pneumonia after cardiac surgery, potentially improving diagnostic accuracy and leading to more precise and timely interventions, with significant potential to inform clinical decision-making and enhance patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.