ArticleScientific reports2024
Extrauterine support of pre-term lambs achieves similar transcriptomic profiling to late pre-term lamb brains.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reproductive technology's animal unconscious: multispecies motherhood and humanimal horror.Medical humanities · 2026Article
- The Ovine Brain as a Model for Human Neurodevelopment: Immunohistochemical Profiling of Brain Maturation Markers in Preterm Lambs.The Journal of comparative neurology · 2026Article
- Artificial Womb Technology for Extremely Premature Neonates: Preclinical Neurodevelopmental Outcomes.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Our group has developed an extra-uterine environment for newborn development (EXTEND) using an ovine model, that aims to mimic the womb to improve short and long-term health outcomes associated with prematurity. This study's objective was to determine the histologic and transcriptomic consequences of EXTEND on the brain. Histology and RNA-sequencing was conducted on brain tissue from three cohorts of lambs: control pre-term (106-107 days), control late pre-term (127 days), and EXTEND lambs who were born pre-term and supported on EXTEND until late pre-term age (125-128 days). Bioinformatic analysis determined differential gene expression among the three cohorts and across four different brain tissue sections: basal ganglia, cerebellum, hippocampus, and motor cortex. There were no clinically relevant histological differences between the control late pre-term and EXTEND ovine brain tissues. RNA-sequencing demonstrated that there was greater differential gene expression between the control pre-term lambs and EXTEND lambs than between the control late pre-term lambs and EXTEND lambs (Supplemental Figs. 1 and 2). Our study demonstrates that the use of EXTEND to support pre-term lambs until they reach late pre-term gestational age results in brain tissue gene expression that more closely resembles that of the lambs who reached late pre-term gestation within their maternal sheep's womb than that of the lambs who were born prematurely.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.