Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39572603›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Novel analytical perspectives on nonlinear instabilities of viscoelastic Bingham fluids in MHD flow fields.

Galal M Moatimid, Yasmeen M Mohamed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Galal M MoatimidDepartment of Mathematics, Faculty of Education, Ain Shams University, Roxy, Cairo, Egypt.
Yasmeen M MohamedDepartment of Mathematics, Faculty of Education, Ain Shams University, Roxy, Cairo, Egypt. yasmeenmostafa@edu.asu.edu.eg.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The nonlinear stability of a plane interface separating two Bingham fluids and fully saturated in porous media is inspected in the existing work. The two fluids are compressed by a normal magnetic field. The two fluids have diverse viscoelasticity, densities, magnetic, and porosity medium, with the existence of surface tension at the interface. The motivation of applied physics and engineering relations has encouraged the discussion of the current paper. Because the mathematical behavior is rather complex, the viscoelasticity involvement is reproduced only at the surface of separation, which is well-known as the viscous potential theory. Thereby, the equations of movement are scrutinized in a linear form, whereas a set of nonlinear boundary conditions are supposed. This procedure produces a nonlinear expressive nonlinear partial differential equation of the interface displacement. The non-perturbative approach which is based on the He's frequency formula is employed to transform the nonlinear distinguishing ordinary differential equation with complex coefficients into a linear one. A novel process relying on the non-perturbative approach is utilized to examine the nonlinear stability and scrutinize the interface presentation. A non-dimensional analysis produces several dimensionless physical numerals. To validate the new approach, a comparison between the non-perturbative approach and its corresponding linear ordinary differential equation via the Mathematica Software is described and interpreted through a set of diagrams. Additionally, the Polar graphs have been elucidated. It is found that the mechanism of the stability does not change in the cases of real and complex coefficients.

Indexed as

Bingham fluidHe’s frequency formulaNonlinear instabilityNon-perturbative approachPorous media

Identifiers

PMID39572603
PMCPMC11582699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.