ArticleScientific reports2024
Detection of hate: speech tweets based convolutional neural network and machine learning algorithms.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2024-12-19Concerns/Issues about Authorship/Affiliation · False/Forged Authorship · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Objections by Author(s) ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is no doubt that social media sites have provided many benefits to humanity, such as sharing information continuously and communicating with others easily. It also seems that social media sites have many advantages, but in addition to these advantages, there are disadvantages that we always strive to find a solution. One of these disadvantages is sharing hate speech. In our study, we're discussing a way to solve this phenomenon by using Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency (TF-IDF) based approach to feature engineering on eleven classifiers for machine and deep learning that can automatically identify hate speech. Three different databases were used, the first of which "Hate speech offensive tweets by Davidson et al.", the second called "Twitter hate speech" and finally we merged the second data with (Cyberbullying dataset (toxicity_parsed_dataset)". The classifiers involved are Logistic Regression (LR), Naive Bayes (NB), Multi-layer Perceptron (MLP), and Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), K-Means, Decision Tree (DT), Gradient Boosting classifier (GBC), and the Extra Trees (ET) in addition to the convolutional neural network (CNN). Maximum accuracy was attained, which exceeded 99%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.