ReviewNature reviews. Disease primers2024
Anorectal malformations.
Review in Nature reviews. Disease primers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effectiveness of intraoperative stay sutures and postoperative anal dilatation in preventing anastomotic stricture after low rectal cancer resection with defunctioning stoma.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Trial
- Radiological analysis of congenital spinal deformities in patients associated with anorectal malformations: a cross-sectional study of 86 patients.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Review
- Congenital heart disease prolongs the time to full enteral feeding in neonates with abdominal operation: a dual-center, propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- Distinct genetic variants from the whole-exome sequencing of syndromic anorectal malformations: A cross-sectional study.iScience · 2026Article
- Familial, environmental, and pregnancy-related risk factors for anorectal malformations in Pakistani newborns: a hospital-based case-control study.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- Analysis of terminal rectal fibrosis and expression of type I and type III collagen proteins in patients with mid-high anorectal malformations.Pediatric surgery international · 2026Article
- Short-term outcomes of centralization on surgical care for patients with anorectal malformations: retrospective cohort study.BJS open · 2025Article
- Characteristics of children born to mothers with an anorectal malformation.Pediatric surgery international · 2025Article
- Comparison of robotic-assisted and laparoscopic-assisted anorectal pull-through for anorectal malformations: a single-center retrospective study.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Strong agreement between self-administered and interview-obtained bowel function score in patients with Hirschsprung disease and anorectal malformation.Pediatric surgery international · 2025Article
- Integrating psychological support in the care of children and adolescents with anorectal malformation or Hirschsprung disease: a ten-year experience.Pediatric surgery international · 2025Observational
- Anorectal Malformations and Hirschsprung Disease: A 30-Year Retrospective Outreach Review.Cureus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anorectal malformations (ARM) are rare congenital anomalies with an overall prevalence of 3.32 per 10,000 pregnancies. ARM describe a spectrum of anomalies of the anus and rectum ranging from a minimally displaced anal canal to a complete fusion of the anorectum, vagina and urethra with hypoplastic sphincter and pelvic floor muscle. Aberrant septation of the hindgut with anomalous cloacal membrane during weeks 6 to 9 of gestation form the developmental basis for a spectrum of anomalies defined as ARM. Although underlying specific syndromes and occasional familiar occurrence suggest genetic aetiology, most ARM are non-syndromic and their causal genetic mechanisms and non-genetic insults remain unclear. ARM is a clinical diagnosis, generally made early after birth via careful inspection of the perineum. Prenatal detection remains rare, and modern technical developments have added little to prenatal diagnostics. ARM is corrected surgically. Since its introduction in 1982, posterior sagittal anorectoplasty is the most common surgery for ARM reconstruction. Subsequent surgical adaptations focus on minimizing iatrogenic operative injury by limiting surgical invasiveness. They include laparoscopic procedures and shortening of incisions with confined dissection in open surgery. Although outcomes in patients with ARM have evolved throughout the past decades, there is urgent need for further improvements both in functional outcomes and quality of life. The importance of psychosocial experiences of affected patients is increasingly recognized. Continued research is necessary to improve prenatal detection, to elucidate genetic and epigenetic alterations and to refine optimal surgical procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39572572What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.