Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39572572›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Disease primers2024

Anorectal malformations.

Ivo de Blaauw, Pernilla Stenström, Atsuyuki Yamataka, Yuichiro Miyake, Heiko Reutter, Paola Midrio, Richard Wood, Caterina Grano, Mikko Pakarinen

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Disease primers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Radiological analysis of congenital spinal deformities in patients associated with anorectal malformations: a cross-sectional study of 86 patients.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ivo de BlaauwDepartment of Surgery, Division of Paediatric Surgery, Radboudumc-Amalia Children's Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. ivo.deblaauw@radboudumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3995-7286
Pernilla StenströmDepartment of Paediatric Surgery, Institution of Clinical Sciences, Lund university, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Atsuyuki YamatakaDepartment of Paediatric General and Urogenital Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuichiro MiyakeDepartment of Paediatric General and Urogenital Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2391-1205
Heiko ReutterDivision of Neonatology and Paediatric Intensive Care, Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3591-5265
Paola MidrioPaediatric Surgery Unit, Cà Foncello Hospital, Treviso, Italy.
Richard WoodDepartment of Paediatric Colorectal and Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.
Caterina GranoDepartment of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1899-0773
Mikko PakarinenDepartment of Paediatric Surgery, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6016-6334

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anorectal malformations (ARM) are rare congenital anomalies with an overall prevalence of 3.32 per 10,000 pregnancies. ARM describe a spectrum of anomalies of the anus and rectum ranging from a minimally displaced anal canal to a complete fusion of the anorectum, vagina and urethra with hypoplastic sphincter and pelvic floor muscle. Aberrant septation of the hindgut with anomalous cloacal membrane during weeks 6 to 9 of gestation form the developmental basis for a spectrum of anomalies defined as ARM. Although underlying specific syndromes and occasional familiar occurrence suggest genetic aetiology, most ARM are non-syndromic and their causal genetic mechanisms and non-genetic insults remain unclear. ARM is a clinical diagnosis, generally made early after birth via careful inspection of the perineum. Prenatal detection remains rare, and modern technical developments have added little to prenatal diagnostics. ARM is corrected surgically. Since its introduction in 1982, posterior sagittal anorectoplasty is the most common surgery for ARM reconstruction. Subsequent surgical adaptations focus on minimizing iatrogenic operative injury by limiting surgical invasiveness. They include laparoscopic procedures and shortening of incisions with confined dissection in open surgery. Although outcomes in patients with ARM have evolved throughout the past decades, there is urgent need for further improvements both in functional outcomes and quality of life. The importance of psychosocial experiences of affected patients is increasingly recognized. Continued research is necessary to improve prenatal detection, to elucidate genetic and epigenetic alterations and to refine optimal surgical procedures.

Indexed as

Anal CanalAnorectal MalformationsFemaleHumansPregnancyQuality of LifeRectum

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.