ArticleUpdates in surgery2025
Anatomic lung resection after target therapy or immune checkpoint inhibitors treatment for initially unresectable advanced-staged non-small cell lung cancer: a case series.
Article in Updates in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Is there a room for radical salvage resection in initially-unresectable non-small cell lung cancer patients after EGFR-TKI based therapy?Translational lung cancer research · 2026Article
- Salvage Pulmonary Resection After Immune Checkpoint or Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Therapy for Initially Unresectable Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review.Biomedicines · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recently targeted therapy and immunotherapy have been demonstrated to improve survival in non-operable, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. The results of salvage lung resection in patients with initially unresectable advanced NSCLC after immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) or Target Therapy (TT) treatment remain limited and unclear. We aimed to define the outcomes of patients undergoing salvage surgery in a real-life setting. A case series study evaluation of clinical data from patients submitted to salvage surgery was performed. Patients included in the study were judged inoperable, according to a multidisciplinary tumor board decision, before being submitted to ICI or TKI treatment. Data were analyzed using Chi-squared, Fisher's and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, where appropriate. Eighteen patients were enrolled. Sixty-seven per cent were Stage IIIB and IV. Fifty per cent of cases received TKI treatment, the remaining patients received ICI alone or with chemo- and/or radiotherapy. Twenty-two per cent of cases were scheduled and successfully performed by minimal invasive approach without needing for conversion. Overall, 5 patients (28%) developed postoperative complications, the 90-day mortality was zero. The major pathologic response rate was 27.7%. The median OS was months 24.7 months with sixteen of 18 patients alive (89%) at last follow-up. No difference was recorded between TT and ICI group in term of complication rate, length of hospital stay and survival. In our experience, salvage surgery after ICI or TT have reasonable post-operative and long-term outcomes. Salvage surgery could be proposed in selected patients after a careful multidisciplinary evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39572514What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.