Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39572467›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of hematology2025

Current treatment approach and future perspectives in B cell lymphoma.

Nobuhiko Yamauchi, Dai Maruyama

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Poor outcome of older patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma after progression.Journal of clinical and experimental hematopathology : JCEH · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Structure, function, and pathology of PHF23.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nobuhiko YamauchiDepartment of Hematology Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31, Ariake, Koto-Ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.
Dai MaruyamaDepartment of Hematology Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31, Ariake, Koto-Ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan. dai.maruyama@jfcr.or.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0654-6920

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and follicular lymphoma (FL) represent the two major subtypes of mature B cell lymphoma. A deeper understanding of tumor biology, as well as molecular classification characterized by targetable gene alterations, and the introduction of novel treatment options, including targeted drugs (e.g., antibody-drug conjugates and small molecules [e.g., Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor]) and immune therapies (e.g., chimeric antigen receptor [CAR] T cell therapy and bispecific antibody [BsAb]), has changed the treatment paradigms for DLBCL and FL. In clinical practice, however, treatment regimens are determined mainly based on prior treatment history, duration of response after previous treatment, patient age, and patient frailty because there have been few randomized trials to inform treatment selection for patients with relapsed or refractory disease and because there is no single prognostic index that guides suitable treatment for each patient. In this review, we summarize the treatment options for DLBCL and FL and discuss the treatment strategies for these two subtypes. We also discuss future perspectives for the treatment of these subtypes.

Indexed as

Lymphoma, FollicularLymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffuseAntibodies, BispecificHumansImmunotherapy, AdoptiveMolecular Targeted TherapyAntibodies, BispecificBispecific antibodyCAR TDiffuse large B cell lymphomaFollicular lymphomaPrimary refractory

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.