ArticleThe AAPS journal2024
Exploring the Correlation between LC-MS Multi-Attribute Method and Conventional Chromatographic Product Quality Assays through Multivariate Data Analysis.
Article in The AAPS journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Qualification and Implementation of a Robust Multi-Attribute Method Platform Across Multiple Laboratories for High-Resolution Process Characterization of Biopharmaceutical Products.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A Multi-Laboratory, Multi-Platform Analysis of the Multi-Attribute Method.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biotherapeutics are subject to inherent heterogeneity due to the complex biomanufacturing processes. Numerous analytical techniques have been employed to identify, characterize, and monitor critical quality attributes (CQAs) to ensure product safety, and efficacy. Mass spectrometry (MS)-based multi-attribute method (MAM) has become increasingly popular in biopharmaceutical industry due to its potential to replace multiple traditional analytical methods. However, the correlation between MAM and conventional methods remains to be fully understood. Additionally, the complex analytical workflow and limited throughput of MAM restricts its implementation as a quality control (QC) release assay. Herein, we present a simple, robust, and rapid MAM workflow for monitoring CQAs. Our rapid approach allowed us to create a database from ~700 samples, including site-specific post-translational modifications (PTMs) quantitation results using MAM and data from traditional charge variant and oxidation characterization methods. To gain insights from this database, we employ multivariate data analysis (MVDA) to thoroughly exploit the data. By applying partial least squares regression (PLSR) models, we demonstrate the ability to quantitatively predict charge variants in ion exchange chromatography (IEX) assay and oxidation abundances in hydrophobic-interaction chromatography (HIC) assay using MAM data, highlighting the interconnectivity between MAM and traditional product quality assays. These findings help evaluate the suitability of MAM as a replacement for conventional methods for release, and more importantly, contribute to enhanced process and product understanding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39572443What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.