Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39572389›Full record

Trial reportPhysiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy2025

Evaluating the Efficacy of Capacitive Resistive Monopolar Radiofrequency Combined With Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation in Managing Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomised Controlled Trial.

Ivan Jurak, Silvija Grabar, Nikolino Žura, Lukrecija Jakuš

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05682287 (The Effect of Capacitive and Resistive Monopolar Radiofrequency of 448 kHz on Pain and Function in People Diagnosed With Lumbar Pain Syndrome), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05682287 nacompletednot on this map

The Effect of Capacitive and Resistive Monopolar Radiofrequency of 448 kHz on Pain and Function in People Diagnosed With Lumbar Pain Syndrome

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Applied Health SciencesRan2022 to 2022Enrolled62ConditionsChronic Low-back Pain, Lumbago, Low Back Pain, RecurrentArms448kHz capacitive resistive monopolar radiofrequency, Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ivan JurakDepartment of Physiotherapy, University of Applied Health Sciences, Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7682-6077
Silvija GrabarDepartment of Physiotherapy, Polyclinic Cerebellum, Varaždin, Croatia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3649-343X
Nikolino ŽuraDepartment of Physiotherapy, University of Applied Health Sciences, Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8693-9649
Lukrecija JakušDepartment of Physiotherapy, University of Applied Health Sciences, Zagreb, Croatia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeThis randomised controlled trial evaluates the effectiveness of capacitive resistive monopolar radiofrequency (CRMRF) combined with proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) training in managing chronic low back pain (CLBP). Given the multifactorial nature of CLBP, this study explores a multimodal treatment approach integrating CRMRF, known for its thermal effects and ability to alleviate pain through improved cell metabolism and microcirculation, with PNF training, which enhances muscle strength, flexibility, and proprioception.

methodsThis study was designed as a single-blind, parallel, randomised controlled trial conducted in an outpatient clinical setting. Over the course of four months, 62 participants, suffering from chronic low back pain were randomly assigned to receive either the combined CRMRF and PNF treatment or PNF alone, with primary outcomes measured in terms of pain and functional disability using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). For secondary outcome of disability associated with pain, Quebec Pain Disability Scale (QPDS) and Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) were used. The study's hypothesis was that the combined treatment would reduce pain and disability more effectively than PNF alone.

resultsResults indicated that the experimental group experienced greater improvements in pain and functional disability, surpassing the minimally clinically important difference (MCID) for the VAS, ODI, QPDS and RMDQ, suggesting the clinical relevance of the combined CRMRF and PNF approach. DISCUSSION: These findings are consistent with previous research highlighting the benefits of CRMRF in various musculoskeletal disorders and suggest that integrating CRMRF with PNF training offers a promising non-invasive treatment option for CLBP sufferers. Overall, our study contributes to the growing evidence base supporting innovative, multimodal treatment strategies for managing CLBP, with the potential to enhance patients' quality of life.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05682287.

Indexed as

Low Back PainPain MeasurementAdultChronic PainCombined Modality TherapyDisability EvaluationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMuscle StrengthMuscle Stretching ExercisesProprioceptionSingle-Blind MethodTreatment Outcomecombined modality therapylow back painpain managementquality of life

Identifiers

PMID39572389
PMCPMC11582020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.