Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39572170›Full record

ArticleStroke and vascular neurology2025

Clinical outcomes of endovascular interventions for cerebral venous thrombosis in Japan: a nationwide retrospective study.

Atsushi Senda, Hiroshi Suginaka, Koji Morishita, Kiyohide Fushimi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stroke and vascular neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Cerebral venous thrombosis: Current management, recent advances and future directions.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Atsushi SendaDepartment of Acute Critical Care and Disaster Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan sendaccm@tmd.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0128-6800
Hiroshi SuginakaToda Chuo General Hospital, Toda, Saitama, Japan.
Koji MorishitaDepartment of Acute Critical Care and Disaster Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Kiyohide FushimiDepartment of Health Policy and Informatics, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) is a rare but serious disease. Despite anticoagulation being the cornerstone therapy, some patients experience worsening disease, necessitating alternative treatment. Endovascular treatment is an anticipated option with an uncertain clinical relevance. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical effects and efficacy of endovascular therapy and identify patient populations that may benefit from treatment. PATIENTS AND

methodsThis retrospective study examined patient data from April 2014 to March 2022 that were extracted from a nationwide Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. The secondary outcomes included modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores and post-hospitalisation complications of cerebral infarction and intracranial haemorrhage. Severity was adjusted using a generalised linear mixed model, and propensity-score matching was employed to compare outcomes between treatment groups.

resultsThe study included 2901 patients; 240 patients in the endovascular treatment group were matched with 240 patients in the standard treatment group. After adjusting for background factors, endovascular treatment did not improve in-hospital mortality (adjusted OR 1.45; 95% CI 0.74 to 2.16) or the mRS score (adjusted OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.23). No subpopulations that could benefit from endovascular treatment were identified. Post-hospitalisation cerebral infarction and intracranial haemorrhage did not increase with endovascular treatment (0.8% in the endovascular treatment group vs 1.2% in the standard treatment group).

conclusionEndovascular treatment showed no significant benefit for patients with CVT, indicating that treatment guidelines need to be refined. Our findings can guide clinical decisions and suggest the necessity of further research on potential benefits in specific subpopulations.

Indexed as

Endovascular ProceduresIntracranial ThrombosisVenous ThrombosisAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDatabases, FactualDisability EvaluationFemaleHospital MortalityHumansIntracranial HemorrhagesJapanMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesInterventionStrokeThrombectomyThromboembolismThrombolytic Therapy

Identifiers

PMID39572170
PMCPMC12415640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.