Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39572132›Full record

GuidelineGastroenterology2024

AGA Living Clinical Practice Guideline on Pharmacological Management of Moderate-to-Severe Ulcerative Colitis.

Siddharth Singh, Edward V Loftus, Berkeley N Limketkai, John P Haydek, Manasi Agrawal, Frank I Scott, Ashwin N Ananthakrishnan, AGA Clinical Guidelines Committee. Electronic address: clinicalpractice@gastro.org

Abstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Gastroenterology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 129 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
129citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

129 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Efficacy of Biological and Steroid Therapies in Adolescent and Adult Patients With Eosinophilic Esophagitis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis With Meta-Regression.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. UBE2L6 drives ulcerative colitis progression by promoting BIRC2 degradation and activating non-canonical NF-κB signalling.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

69 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Siddharth SinghDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California; Division of Biomedical Informatics, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Edward V LoftusDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, Minnesota.
Berkeley N LimketkaiVatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, University of California, Los Angeles, School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California.
John P HaydekDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Multidisciplinary Center for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Manasi AgrawalThe Dr. Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York; Center for Molecular Prediction of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (PREDICT), Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Frank I ScottCrohn's and Colitis Center, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Denver, Colorado.
Ashwin N AnanthakrishnanDivision of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
AGA Clinical Guidelines Committee. Electronic address: clinicalpractice@gastro.org

Funding

Determinants of inception of inflammation in inflammatory bowel diseasesR01DK127171 · NIDDK · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI ANANTHAKRISHNAN, ASHWIN N, XAVIER, RAMNIK J · 2021 to 2025
$5.4M
Comparative effectiveness research in Hispanic patients with inflammatory bowel diseasesR01DK135937 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Siddharth Singh · 2024 to 2026
$1.9M
Early-life Risk Factors for Inflammatory Bowel DiseaseK23DK129762 · NIDDK · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI AGRAWAL, MANASI · 2021 to 2025
$951k
NCCDPHP CDC HHS U01 DP006745NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK129762NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK127171NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK135937
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND &

aimsThis American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) living guideline is intended to support practitioners in the pharmacological management of moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC).

methodsA multidisciplinary panel of content experts and guideline methodologists used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework to prioritize clinical questions, identify patient-centered outcomes, conduct an evidence synthesis, and develop recommendations on the pharmacological management of moderate-to-severe UC.

resultsThe AGA guideline panel made 14 recommendations. In adult outpatients with moderate-to-severe UC, the AGA recommends the use of infliximab, golimumab, vedolizumab, tofacitinib, upadacitinib, ustekinumab, ozanimod, etrasimod, risankizumab, and guselkumab, and suggests the use of adalimumab, filgotinib, and mirikizumab over no treatment. In patients who are naïve to advanced therapies, the AGA suggests using a higher-efficacy medication (eg, infliximab, vedolizumab, ozanimod, etrasimod, upadacitinib, risankizumab, and guselkumab) or an intermediate-efficacy medication (eg, golimumab, ustekinumab, tofacitinib, filgotinib, and mirikizumab) rather than a lower-efficacy medication (eg, adalimumab). In patients who have previously been exposed to 1 or more advanced therapies, particularly tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α antagonists, the AGA suggests using a higher-efficacy medication (eg, tofacitinib, upadacitinib, and ustekinumab) or an intermediate-efficacy medication (eg, filgotinib, mirikizumab, risankizumab, and guselkumab) rather than a lower-efficacy medication (eg, adalimumab, vedolizumab, ozanimod, and etrasimod). In adult outpatients with moderate-to-severe UC, the AGA suggests against using thiopurine monotherapy for induction of remission, but suggests using thiopurine monotherapy over no treatment for maintenance of (typically corticosteroid-induced) remission. The AGA suggests against using methotrexate monotherapy, for induction or maintenance of remission. In adult outpatients with moderate-to-severe UC, the AGA suggests the use of infliximab, adalimumab, and golimumab in combination with an immunomodulator over corresponding monotherapy. However, the AGA makes no recommendation in favor of, or against, the use of non-TNF antagonist biologics in combination with an immunomodulator over non-TNF biologic alone. In patients with UC who are in corticosteroid-free clinical remission for at least 6 months on combination therapy of TNF antagonists and an immunomodulator, the AGA suggests against withdrawal of TNF antagonists, but makes no recommendation in favor of, or against, withdrawing immunomodulators. In adult outpatients with moderate-to-severe UC, who have failed 5-aminosalicylates, and have escalated to therapy with immunomodulators or advanced therapies, the AGA suggests stopping 5-aminosalicylates. Finally, in adult outpatients with moderate-severe UC, the AGA suggests early use of advanced therapies and/or immunomodulator therapy, rather than gradual step-up after failure of 5-aminosalicylates. The panel also proposed key implementation considerations for optimal use of these medications and identified several knowledge gaps and areas for future research.

conclusionsThis guideline provides a comprehensive, patient-centered approach to the pharmacological management of patients with moderate-to-severe UC.

Indexed as

Colitis, UlcerativeGastrointestinal AgentsSeverity of Illness IndexConsensusDrug Therapy, CombinationEvidence-Based MedicineGastroenterologyHumansRemission InductionSocieties, MedicalTreatment OutcomeGastrointestinal AgentsEvidence SynthesisInflammatory Bowel DiseaseNetwork Meta-AnalysisPositioning

Identifiers

PMID39572132
PMCPMC12162142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.