Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39572094›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Efficacy and safety of hyperbaric oxygen therapy for Parkinson's disease with cognitive dysfunction: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Weiqiang Tan, Zhaoquan Pan, Fengxi Xie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Weiqiang TanGuangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning, Guangxi, China 791420012@qq.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3009-0214
Zhaoquan PanGuangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Fengxi XieMaoming Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Maoming, Guangdong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe presence of cognitive dysfunction notably affects the quality of life in individuals diagnosed with Parkinson's disease (PD) and is often recognised as a non-motor symptom. Comprehensive studies have shown the possible advantages of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) in alleviating cognitive deficits in these individuals. This systematic review aims to investigate the practicality of incorporating HBOT within a more extensive therapeutic framework for PD, with a specific focus on cognitive symptoms. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A comprehensive literature review will be conducted utilising various databases such as PubMed and Cochrane Library and so on. The duration of the search will encompass the entire timeline from the initiation of each database up to 1 April 2024. This investigation seeks to uncover randomised controlled trials that explore the efficacy and safety of HBOT in patients with PD who are facing cognitive impairments. The authors' autonomous screening and extraction of data will facilitate the attainment of impartial results. The assessment of possible biases will be conducted using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool, while statistical analyses will be executed with RevMan V.5.3 and Stata V.15.0. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: As this review synthesises and evaluates previously conducted studies, the requirement for ethical approval is not applicable. The findings from this review will be shared via academic publications, comprehensive reports and presentations at pertinent conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42024504763.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionHyperbaric OxygenationParkinson DiseaseHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicQuality of LifeResearch DesignSystematic Reviews as TopicCognitionParkinson's DiseaseReview

Identifiers

PMID39572094
PMCPMC11580330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.