ArticleLupus science & medicine2024
Role of intravenous immunoglobulins in the management of systemic lupus erythematosus: a single-centre experience.
Article in Lupus science & medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The 2026 British Society for Rheumatology guideline for the management of children, young people and adults with systemic lupus erythematosus.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2026Guideline
- Invasive aspergillosis in autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases: epidemiology, risk factors, diagnosis, management and challenges.Annals of medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesSystemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease of unknown aetiology that can affect almost any organ in the body. Although there are no specific guidelines for the use of intravenous immunoglobulin (IG) in the treatment of patients with SLE, it is thought to be an effective treatment. Our study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of intravenous IG and to describe the possible profile of patients with SLE who are candidates for intravenous IG treatment.
methodsThis study was designed to retrospectively analyse patients with SLE treated with 2 g/kg/month of intravenous IG (divided across 5 consecutive days). We collected demographic, clinical, laboratory and treatment data from the patient files. The side effects of the intravenous IG treatment, changes in the immunosuppressive therapy used and changes in the clinical and laboratory parameters after the intravenous IG treatment were evaluated.
resultsThis study included 31 patients with SLE. The main indication for intravenous IG treatment was haematological involvement (20, 64.5%) and thrombocytopenia in particular (8, 25.8%). Intravenous IG was initiated mainly for refractory disease. At the end of the treatment, the acute phase values, proteinuria, complement levels and anti-double-stranded DNA decreased significantly (p<0.001). In most cases, the side effects were mild and usually manifested as myalgia or a fever.
conclusionDespite its high cost, intravenous IG has demonstrated effectiveness in treating refractory SLE, especially when there is haematological involvement. Specific clinical features at baseline may identify the patients who are more likely to respond to this therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.