ArticleRevista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social2024
[Validation of a rapid anesthesia satisfaction scale in the anesthetic procedure].
Article in Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The degree of satisfaction is an indicator of the quality of health care. Its measurement allows to understand the strengths and weaknesses associated with the anesthesia procedure and to improve the quality of service. Objective: To evaluate the validity and consistency of a new rapid scale of patient satisfaction with the anesthetic procedure. Material and methods: Comparative, longitudinal study in patients in post-anesthetic care. It consisted of two phases: Phase 1: Development of a Likert-type rapid scale to assess post-anesthesia patient satisfaction. Patients were pilot tested to evaluate the wording until 2 consecutive rounds were achieved. Phase 2: The developed instrument (ERSAPA according to its initials in Spanish) and the control questionnaire (LPPSq) were administered to patients after their discharge from the Post-Anesthesia Care Unit. Cronbach's alpha was used to evaluate the internal consistency between both tests, and Sperman's rho for convergent validity. Results: A total of 250 patients were surveyed. An overall satisfaction was achieved in 82.46% of the population. The domain with the highest agreement was pre-anesthesia consultation care. The internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) was 0.84, with a Spearman's convergent validity of 0.719 (p = 0.001), and an intra-observer reliability analysis by intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.945 (p = 0.001). Conclusions: The ERSAPA scale is consistent and valid for assessing patient satisfaction in the Anesthesia Service.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.