Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39571731›Full record

ArticleJournal of advanced research2025

An accurate prediction for respiratory diseases using deep learning on bronchoscopy diagnosis images.

Weiling Sun, Pengfei Yan, Minglei Li, Xiang Li, Yuchen Jiang, Hao Luo, Yanbin Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advanced research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Weiling SunDepartment of Medical Oncology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin 150040, China; Department of Endoscope, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin 150040, China.
Pengfei YanDepartment of Control Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China.
Minglei LiDepartment of Control Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China.
Xiang LiDepartment of Control Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China.
Yuchen JiangDepartment of Control Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China.
Hao LuoDepartment of Control Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China. Electronic address: hao.luo@hit.edu.cn.
Yanbin ZhaoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin 150040, China. Electronic address: zhaoyanbin1978@sina.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBronchoscopy is of great significance in diagnosing and treating respiratory illness. Using deep learning, a diagnostic system for bronchoscopy images can improve the accuracy of tracheal, bronchial, and pulmonary disease diagnoses for physicians and ensure timely pathological or etiological examinations for patients. Improving the diagnostic accuracy of the algorithms remains the key to this technology.

objectivesTo deal with the problem, we proposed a multiscale attention residual network (MARN) for diagnosing lung conditions through bronchoscopic images. The multiscale convolutional block attention module (MCBAM) was designed to enable accurate focus on lesion regions by enhancing spatial and channel features. Gradient-weighted Class Activation Map (Grad-CAM) was provided to increase the interpretability of diagnostic results.

methodsWe collected 615 cases from Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, including 2900 images. The dataset was partitioned randomly into training sets, validation sets and test sets to update model parameters, evaluate the model's training performance, select network architecture and parameters, and estimate the final model. In addition, we compared MARN with other algorithms. Furthermore, three physicians with different qualifications were invited to diagnose the same test images, and the results were compared to those of the model.

resultsIn the dataset of normal and lesion images, our model displayed an accuracy of 97.76% and an AUC of 99.79%. The model recorded 92.26% accuracy and 96.82% AUC for datasets of benign and malignant lesion images, while it achieved 93.10% accuracy and 99.02% AUC for normal, benign, and malignant lesion images.

conclusionThese results demonstrated that our network outperforms other methods in diagnostic performance. The accuracy of our model is roughly the same as that of experienced physicians and the efficiency is much higher than doctors. MARN has great potential for assisting physicians with assessing the bronchoscopic images precisely.

Indexed as

BronchoscopyDeep LearningRespiratory Tract DiseasesAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedAttention mechanismBronchoscopyComputer aided diagnosisConvolutional neural networkDeep learning

Identifiers

PMID39571731
PMCPMC12793794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.