ArticleEnvironmental research2025
Wildfire-relevant woodsmoke and extracellular vesicles (EVs): Alterations in EV proteomic signatures involved in extracellular matrix degradation and tissue injury in airway organotypic models.
Article in Environmental research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Temporal variation in markers of immune signaling and wound repair in primary human airway epithelial cells following acute versus repeated woodsmoke condensate exposure.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2026Article
- Advancing chemical mixture toxicity assessment using advanced in vitro NAMs: current status and future perspectives.Frontiers in toxicology · 2026Review
- DifferentialACS ES&T air · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Wildfires adversely impact air quality and public health worldwide. Exposures to wildfire smoke are linked to adverse health outcomes, including cardiopulmonary diseases. Critical research gaps remain surrounding the underlying biological pathways leading to wildfire-induced health effects. The regulation of intercellular communication and downstream toxicity driven by extracellular vesicles (EVs) is an important, understudied biological mechanism. This study investigated EVs following a wildfire smoke-relevant in vitro exposure. We hypothesized that woodsmoke (WS) would alter the proteomic content of EVs secreted in organotypic in vitro airway models. Exposures were carried out using a tri-culture model of alveolar epithelial cells, fibroblasts, and endothelial cells and a simplified co-culture model of alveolar epithelial cells and fibroblasts to inform responses across different cell populations. Epithelial cells were exposed to WS condensate and EVs were isolated from basolateral conditioned medium following 24 h exposure. WS exposure did not influence EV particle characteristics, and it moderately increased EV count. Exposure caused the differential loading of 25 and 35 proteins within EVs collected from the tri- and co-culture model, respectively. EV proteins involved in extracellular matrix degradation and wound healing were consistently modulated across both models. However, distinct proteins involved in the wound healing pathway were altered between models, suggesting unique but concerted efforts across cell types to communicate in response to injury. These findings demonstrate that a wildfire-relevant exposure alters the EV proteome and suggest an impact on EV-mediated intercellular communication. Overall, results demonstrate the viability of organotypic approaches in evaluating EVs to investigate exposure-induced biomarkers and underlying mechanisms. Findings also highlight the impact of differences in the biological complexity of in vitro models used to evaluate the effects of inhaled toxicants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.