Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39571141›Full record

ArticleAustralasian psychiatry : bulletin of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists2025

Diagnostic testing in psychiatry: insights and examples from a Bayesian perspective.

Paul A Maguire, Jeffrey Cl Looi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Australasian psychiatry : bulletin of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Paul A MaguireAcademic Unit of Psychiatry and Addiction Medicine, School of Medicine and Psychology, The Australian National University, Canberra Hospital, Canberra, ACT, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5002-9918
Jeffrey Cl LooiAcademic Unit of Psychiatry and Addiction Medicine, School of Medicine and Psychology, The Australian National University, Canberra Hospital, Canberra, ACT, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3351-6911

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo demonstrate the application of Bayes' theorem to diagnostic testing in clinical settings, especially with respect to rare diseases, enhancing an understanding of pre-test probability and its implications.

conclusionBayes' theorem enables the revision of the conditional probabilities of an event occurring when new information is acquired. It demonstrates that when the prevalence of a disease is very low, there are a high number of false positives, thereby reducing the clinical utility and cost benefit profile of the diagnostic test, even in the presence of relatively high sensitivities and specificities of the chosen test.

Indexed as

Diagnostic Tests, RoutineMental DisordersPsychiatryBayes TheoremHumansanti-NMDAR encephalitisBayesianclinical utilityposterior probabilityprior probability

Identifiers

PMID39571141
PMCPMC11804144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.