Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39570994›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2024

Deep neural networks for endemic measles dynamics: Comparative analysis and integration with mechanistic models.

Wyatt G Madden, Wei Jin, Benjamin Lopman, Andreas Zufle, Benjamin Dalziel, C Jessica E Metcalf, Bryan T Grenfell, Max S Y Lau

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Pre-training Epidemic Time Series Forecasters with Compartmental Prototypes.KDD : proceedings. International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Toward AI foundation models for epidemics: Promise, challenges, and paths forward.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Wyatt G MaddenDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9792-7077
Wei JinDepartment of Computer Science, College of Arts and Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Benjamin LopmanDepartment of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Andreas ZufleDepartment of Computer Science, College of Arts and Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Benjamin DalzielDepartment of Integrative Biology, Oregon State University, Oregon, United States of America.
C Jessica E MetcalfDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, United States of America.
Bryan T GrenfellDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, United States of America.
Max S Y LauDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6590-0294

Funding

CDC HHS CDC-RFA-FT-23-0069
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Measles is an important infectious disease system both for its burden on public health and as an opportunity for studying nonlinear spatio-temporal disease dynamics. Traditional mechanistic models often struggle to fully capture the complex nonlinear spatio-temporal dynamics inherent in measles outbreaks. In this paper, we first develop a high-dimensional feed-forward neural network model with spatial features (SFNN) to forecast endemic measles outbreaks and systematically compare its predictive power with that of a classical mechanistic model (TSIR). We illustrate the utility of our model using England and Wales measles data from 1944-1965. These data present multiple modeling challenges due to the interplay between metapopulations, seasonal trends, and nonlinear dynamics related to demographic changes. Our results show that while the TSIR model yields similarly performant short-term (1 to 2 biweeks ahead) forecasts for highly populous cities, our neural network model (SFNN) consistently achieves lower root mean squared error (RMSE) across other forecasting windows. Furthermore, we show that our spatial-feature neural network model, without imposing mechanistic assumptions a priori, can uncover gravity-model-like spatial hierarchy of measles spread in which major cities play an important role in driving regional outbreaks. We then turn our attention to integrative approaches that combine mechanistic and machine learning models. Specifically, we investigate how the TSIR can be utilized to improve a state-of-the-art approach known as Physics-Informed-Neural-Networks (PINN) which explicitly combines compartmental models and neural networks. Our results show that the TSIR can facilitate the reconstruction of latent susceptible dynamics, thereby enhancing both forecasts in terms of mean absolute error (MAE) and parameter inference of measles dynamics within the PINN. In summary, our results show that appropriately designed neural network-based models can outperform traditional mechanistic models for short to long-term forecasts, while simultaneously providing mechanistic interpretability. Our work also provides valuable insights into more effectively integrating machine learning models with mechanistic models to enhance public health responses to measles and similar infectious disease systems.

Indexed as

Disease OutbreaksEndemic DiseasesMeaslesNeural Networks, ComputerComputational BiologyEnglandEpidemiological ModelsForecastingHumansWales

Identifiers

PMID39570994
PMCPMC11620694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.