ArticlePloS one2024
Multi-dimensional impact assessment for priority setting of agricultural technologies: An application of TOPSIS for the drylands of sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Design and Evaluation of an Automated Ultraviolet-C Irradiation System for Maize Seed Disinfection and Monitoring.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Applying microbial biostimulants and drought-tolerant genotypes to enhance barley growth and yield under drought stress.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The importance for multi-dimensional priority-setting of agricultural innovations is growing, given that agricultural technologies usually play multiple roles for smallholder farmers. This study assesses agricultural technologies based on their multi-dimensional impacts in the drylands of sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. The study applies the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) to a set of promising agricultural technologies and uses three outcome criteria: the benefit-cost ratio, poverty reduction, and nutrition security. The technologies are related to important cereals and grain legumes grown in these regions: sorghum, pearl millet, and finger millet; groundnut, cowpea, chickpea, lentil, pigeon pea, and soybean. The results show that the top technologies based on individual criteria can differ from the top technologies identified using a combination of criteria. For example, in semi-arid southern Africa, a promising technology which involves integrated pest management for cowpea ranks among the top five technologies which can reduce poverty. However, the analysis involving TOPSIS shows that nutrition security is more important in that region compared to poverty. As such, the top 5 technologies with the highest multi-dimensional impact for semi-arid southern Africa do not involve a cowpea technology; rather, they are all related to pigeon pea, a nutritious grain legume which is currently more consumed in that region compared to cowpea. One limitation of this study is that it did not consider all the roles of agricultural technologies in the drylands of sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia; this should be considered in future studies involving TOPSIS or other MCDM techniques. Nevertheless, the study shows that TOPSIS can successfully be used for multi-dimensional ex-ante impact assessment of agricultural technologies, and thus can support the prioritization of investments targeting agricultural research for development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.