Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39570950›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Same calls, different meanings: Acoustic communication of Holocentridae.

Marine Banse, Noémie Hanssen, Justine Sabbe, David Lecchini, Terry J Donaldson, Guillaume Iwankow, Anthony Lagant, Eric Parmentier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marine BanseFaculté des Sciences, Laboratoire de Morphologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive, Universiteé de Lieège, Lieège, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-9689-1079
Noémie HanssenFaculté des Sciences, Laboratoire de Morphologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive, Universiteé de Lieège, Lieège, Belgium.
Justine SabbeFaculté des Sciences, Laboratoire de Morphologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive, Universiteé de Lieège, Lieège, Belgium.
David LecchiniPSL University, EPHE-UPVD-CNRS, UAR3278 CRIOBE, Moorea, French Polynesia.
Terry J DonaldsonUniversity of Guam's Marine Laboratory/Guam EPSCoR, UOG Station, Mangilao, Guam, United States of America.
Guillaume IwankowPSL University, EPHE-UPVD-CNRS, UAR3278 CRIOBE, Moorea, French Polynesia.
Anthony LagantPSL University, EPHE-UPVD-CNRS, UAR3278 CRIOBE, Moorea, French Polynesia.
Eric ParmentierFaculté des Sciences, Laboratoire de Morphologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive, Universiteé de Lieège, Lieège, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-0391-7530

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The literature on sound production behaviours in fish in the wild is quite sparse. In several taxa, associations between different sound types and given behaviours have been reported. In the Holocentridae, past nomenclature of the different sound types (knocks, growls, grunts, staccatos and thumps) has been confusing because it relies on the use of several terms that are not always based on fine descriptions. Our study aims to ascertain whether holocentrids can produce a variety of sounds in the wild and if these sounds are associated with specific behaviours. Additionally, we aim to determine whether sounds produced by hand-held specimens, a common methodology to record sounds in standardised conditions in fishes, could correspond to some sounds produced by free-swimming individuals in natural conditions. Our study shows that all holocentrid species are able to produce sounds in 6 behavioural contexts of both agonistic (conspecific and heterospecific chases, competition) and social signalling types (acceleration, broadcasting, body quivering), in addition to previously described mobbing towards moray eels and symbiotic interactions with cleaner wrasses. In holocentrids, acoustic communication is not only based on single calls but can also involve series of sounds of different types that are arranged randomly. The large amount of combinations within acoustical events for each behaviour, resulting from both the quantity of sounds and their diversity, supports the absence of stereotypy. This suggests that sounds are produced to reinforce visual communication during the day in this family. Our results also suggest that sounds recorded by hand-held fishes are produced naturally in the wild. Our study challenges past nomenclatures and demonstrates sound critical function in augmenting visual communication, advancing our comprehension of acoustic ecology in teleost species.

Indexed as

AcousticsVocalization, AnimalAnimal CommunicationAnimalsFishesSound

Identifiers

PMID39570950
PMCPMC11581312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.