ArticlePloS one2024
RNA quality and protamine gene expression after storage of mouse testes under different conditions.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- RNA Stability: A Review of the Role of Structural Features and Environmental Conditions.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Protamines are proteins responsible for condensing sperm chromatin. There are two protamines whose ratio remains constant in each species and which is related to fertility. To quantify their expression, it is necessary to have a good protocol of sample collection (i.e., RNA stabilizing buffers and temperature conditions). The aim of this work was to compare gene expression of protamines, with analysis of RNA quality and ratios, in testis samples from wild-derived mice, Mus musculus, preserved in different buffers (RNAlater® or Nucleic Acid Preservation-NAP-buffer) and different temperatures (room temperature -RT-, 4°C, -20°C, -80°C or liquid nitrogen) for different times (one week, one month, 3 months and one year). The relative abundance of protamine expression was assessed by qPCR using 18S rRNA as housekeeping. The results showed that the preservation of testes in RNAlater® or NAP buffer at -80°C afforded equivalent good preservation as in somatic tissues. Testis samples stored at RT in both buffers for 1 week resulted in a similar RNA quality and protamine expression over time. Moreover, samples in RNAlater® stored at RT, 4°C, -20°C and -80°C, were analyzed after 24 h, 7 days, 30 days, 90 days or 365 days; samples stored at RT resulted in a loss of RNA quality but protamine ratio was maintained up to 90 days. Samples stored at 4°C and -20°C showed similar values of RNA integrity and protamine expression than those stored at -80°C. Finally, we stored testis samples at -80°C or -196°C, after initial snap-freezing in liquid nitrogen. Both methods afforded very good preservation of RNA integrity and protamine expression. These results open new possibilities for the collection, transport and storage of testes samples under field conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.