ArticlePloS one2024
Analysis of inorganic arsenic and methylarsenic in soil after derivatization by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) has been applied to the analysis of arsenic forms in water, plants, and other samples; however, it has not been used to determine the form of arsenic in soil due to the complex soil matrix. The purpose of this study was to develop an analytical method for the simultaneous determination of inorganic arsenic species (As (III) and As (V)) and monomethylarsonic acid (MMA) in soil using GC-MS. The arsenic compounds were subjected to derivatization with 2,3-dimercapto-1-propanol (BAL) and subsequently analyzed using GC-MS. The BAL volume, derivatization reaction time, and temperature were optimized using standard added soil extracts. A reaction with 150 μL of BAL at 40°C for 30 min was selected as the optimal condition for quantitative derivatization of both inorganic arsenic (iAs) and MMA. The calibration curves exhibited linearity within the range of 5-100 ng/mL for each arsenic species, with correlation coefficients exceeding 0.997. The limits of detection for each arsenic species were determined to be 0.24 ng/mL and 1.31 ng/mL, respectively. The accuracy of the method was verified by the recovery of reference samples. The recovery experiments for reference samples showed that the recovery rates for As (III), As (V), and MMA were 89.5-93.7%, 88.5-105.6%, and 90.2-95.8% respectively, with precision ranging from 4.6 to 6.5%, 2.3 to 3.8%, and 2.4 to 6.3%. These results indicate good accuracy and precision. The accuracy of this method is not significantly different from that of liquid chromatography-inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (p = 0.05). The optimized method was sensitive, convenient and reliable for the extraction and analysis of different arsenic species in soil samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.