ArticlePloS one2024
Association of tobacco purchasing behaviors with tobacco use by user groups during the COVID-19 pandemic: A mixed methods analysis.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo understand changes in purchasing behaviors and use of tobacco products such as e-cigarettes and cigarettes among different tobacco user groups during the COVID-19 pandemic using a mixed methods approach.
methodsA quantitative online survey was conducted in October-November 2020 using a national probability sample of US adults (N = 1,460) comprising exclusive cigarette smokers (n = 1,080), dual users of both cigarettes and e-cigarettes (n = 143), and exclusive e-cigarette users (n = 237). Simultaneously, ten online focus groups were conducted with 61 adults in the Atlanta, GA area including exclusive smokers (n = 16), current E-cigarette users (n = 22), and transitioning (recently quit or currently quitting) smokers and/or E-cigarette users (n = 23).
resultsFrom the survey, dual users vs. exclusive smokers had higher odds of buying cheaper cigarette brands (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.50, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.49, 4.20), buying cigarettes online (aOR = 2.79; 95% CI = 1.02, 7.69), buying from Indian Reservations (aOR = 3.99; 95% CI = 2.07, 7.69), buying fewer cigarettes than normal (aOR = 4.01; 95% CI = 2.42, 6.65) and buying other tobacco products (aOR = 4.44; 95% CI = 2.24, 8.79). From the focus groups, participants perceived reduced accessibility, fear of contracting COVID-19, rising prices, and convenience to influence their purchasing behaviors and tobacco use.
conclusionsExclusive and dual users differed in their tobacco purchasing behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic, such that dual users were more likely to change their purchasing behaviors (e.g., buying other tobacco products) than exclusive users. Educational campaigns and public health workers may promote interventions targeting dual users either to switch to reduced-risk products or quit smoking, particularly during stressful societal situations such as the COVID-19 pandemic. IMPLICATIONS: The findings inform public health educators and policymakers to develop policies and interventions carefully tailored for tobacco user groups targeting the perceived factors influencing purchasing behaviors during challenging situations affecting tobacco product availability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.