Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39570882›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Effects of prebiotic and multispecies probiotic supplementation on the gut microbiota, immune function, and growth performance of weaned piglets.

Soimer Omar Baldera Huaman, Fernando Augusto de Souza, Melina Aparecida Bonato, Cleandro Pazinato Dias, Marco Aurélio Callegari, Alexandre Oba, Rafael Humberto de Carvalho, Caio Abércio da Silva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. A ProbioticMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Immunomodulatory effects ofFrontiers in immunology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Soimer Omar Baldera HuamanDepartment of Animal Science, State University of Londrina, Londrina, Paraná, Brazil.
Fernando Augusto de SouzaICC Brazil, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9164-4490
Melina Aparecida BonatoICC Brazil, São Paulo, Brazil.
Cleandro Pazinato DiasAkei Animal Research, Fartura, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marco Aurélio CallegariAkei Animal Research, Fartura, São Paulo, Brazil.
Alexandre ObaDepartment of Animal Science, State University of Londrina, Londrina, Paraná, Brazil.
Rafael Humberto de CarvalhoDepartment of Animal Science, State University of Londrina, Londrina, Paraná, Brazil.
Caio Abércio da SilvaDepartment of Animal Science, State University of Londrina, Londrina, Paraná, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9123-0343

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we evaluated the impact of yeast cell wall prebiotics and multispecies probiotics on the gut microbiota, immune response, and growth performance of weaned piglets, as alternatives to antibiotics as growth promoters (AGPs). A randomized complete block design was employed, involving 160 piglets divided into four treatment groups during the nursery phase. The treatments applied throughout the experimental period were as follows: CONT+ = basal diet with halquinol (AGP); YCW = basal diet with yeast cell wall (cell wall of Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast); SIM+ = basal diet with yeast cell wall + multispecies probiotic (Bacillus subtilis (2.0 x 109 CFU/g), Bacillus coagulans (5.0 x 108 CFU/g), Clostridium butyricum (5.0 x 107 CFU/g), and Bacillus licheniformis (2.0 x 109 CFU/g)); SIM- = basal diet with yeast cell wall + multispecies probiotic (half dose). The parameters assessed included daily feed intake, weight gain, feed conversion ratio (FCR), diarrhea score, serum cytokine levels, and chemokine concentrations, as well as microbiota analysis. During the 21 to 63-day study period, only FCR differed significantly (p = 0.0076). CONT+ and PREB had superior FCRs of 1.543 and 1.585, while SIM- had the least favorable FCR at 1.654. At 35 days, IL-10 levels were greater in the SIM- group, showing a 271.25% increase over those in the other groups. By 49 days, the IL-8 concentration was lower in the PREB group than in the CONT+ group, with a reduction of 247%, while the IL-8 concentrations in the SIM+ and SIM- groups were not significantly different from those in the other groups. The Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes (F/B) ratio in the CONT+ group was lower than that in the PREB, SIM+, and SIM- treatment groups. The Lactobacillaceae family was more abundant in the SIM+ treatment, followed by the SIM- and PREB treatments. The CONT+ treatment had the lowest abundance. The abundance of the genus Lactobacillus differed between the CONT+ group and the PREB, SIM+, and SIM- treatment groups. Prebiotics, used either alone or combined with probiotics, serve as effective substitutes for AGPs, boosting piglets' health and performance throughout the nursery phase.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomePrebioticsProbioticsAnimal FeedAnimalsCytokinesDietary SupplementsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSwineWeaningCytokinesPrebiotics

Identifiers

PMID39570882
PMCPMC11581253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.