ArticlePloS one2024
Exploring physician leadership perceptions: Insights from first- and final-year medical students.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Understanding of medical leadership from the perspective of medical students at the start of their studies and in their final year - a qualitative focus group study.GMS journal for medical education · 2026Article
- Valued Traits of Physician Leaders: A Comparative Study of First-Year and Final-Year Medical Students' Perceptions.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentArticle
- From Optimism to Prioritization: A Comparative Study of First- and Final-Year Medical Students' Interest in Physician Leadership Roles.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLeadership competence is increasingly recognized as a critical priority for all physicians, but new graduates often feel only partially prepared for leadership roles. However, integrating more leadership education into the already saturated medical curriculum poses challenges regarding timing and implementation. This study explores this issue by comparing perceptions of medical students during their academic journey to determine if leadership education could begin at the onset of medical studies.
methodsIn 2021, internet-based questionnaires were administered to first- and final-year medical students at the University of Oulu, Finland. Participation rates were 100% (116/116) for first-year students and 98% (107/109) for final-year students. Responses to the open-ended question, "How should physicians be led?" were analyzed using qualitative inductive content analysis with thematization.
resultsThe study identified three main thematic categories common to both groups: (1) traits, (2) leadership approach, and (3) healthcare culture. The theme of leadership approach was further divided into two subcategories: science-oriented leadership based on practice approach and goal-oriented leadership with support as needed. The theme of traits was divided into seven subcategories: education, role model, communication, empowerment, ethics, autonomy, and collegiality. No notable differences emerged between the two groups.
conclusionsConsistent perceptions about physician leadership throughout medical education suggest that leadership education could commence from the first year. It can thus be integrated throughout the existing longitudinal learning of the medical curriculum. Integration into the existing curriculum could facilitate the development of leadership skills without extending the curriculum's content.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.