ArticlePloS one2024
Spinal motor evoked responses elicited by transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation in chronic stroke: Correlation between spinal cord excitability, demographic characteristics, and functional outcomes.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Objective Biomarker Development for Parameter Optimization in Neuromodulation Using High-Density EMG Temporal and Spatial Features.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The effects of electrode configuration and location on motor thresholds, tolerance, and muscle selectivity of transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation in stroke.Journal of neurophysiology · 2026Article
- Characteristics of posterior root reflexes evoked by transcutaneous spinal stimulation with various pulse durations.Journal of neurophysiology · 2026Article
- The effects of stimulation waveform and carrier frequency on tolerance and motor thresholds elicited by transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation in stroke.Clinical neurophysiology practice · 2025Article
- Multimodal Machine Learning to Personalize Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation for Stroke Rehabilitation.Digital biomarkersArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) is becoming a promising neuromodulation technique to promote motor recovery in various neurological conditions, including stroke. As this intervention moves forward into clinical practice, it is important to understand how the elicited neurophysiological measures are related to the functional and neuromuscular deficits of the population of interest in order to personalize tSCS interventions and assess its effectiveness. Specifically, neurophysiological measurements of spinal cord excitability can be achieved by recording with EMG spinal motor evoked responses (sMERs) in muscles after applying single pulses of tSCS to the spinal cord. The objective of this study was to investigate potential correlations between baseline spinal cord excitability, as measured by resting motor threshold (RMT) and peak-to-peak (P2P) amplitude of the sMERs, and various factors including demographic characteristics, severity of spasticity, muscle strength, and gait speed in individuals post-stroke. Additionally, the study sought to explore disparities in excitability between the paretic and non-paretic sides. Fifteen participants with chronic stroke underwent sMER assessments. We observed a strong positive correlation between RMT and body weight, indicating weight as a potential confounding variable when comparing RMTs from sMERs between individuals. Furthermore, paretic muscles exhibited lower RMTs and higher P2P amplitudes compared to non-paretic muscles. The results demonstrate that sMERs hold promise in uncovering disparities in spinal excitability in stroke participants. Furthermore, careful interpretation and analysis of sMERs is advised, particularly as higher RMTs were associated with higher body weight and could impact the clinical feasibility of tSCS for some participants. These results should be considered in future tSCS protocols that aim to develop more personalized interventions across different neurological populations and optimize sMERs' utility as an outcome measure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.