Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39570824›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

A protocol for investigating long-term social discrimination memory: Evidence in female and male Long Evans rats.

Fardad Pirri, Francine F Burke, Cheryl M McCormick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fardad PirriDepartment of Biological Sciences, Brock University, St. Catharines, Canada.
Francine F BurkeDepartment of Psychology, Brock University, St. Catharines, Canada.
Cheryl M McCormickDepartment of Biological Sciences, Brock University, St. Catharines, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0482-3875

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social discrimination, the investigation of a novel peer more so than a familiar peer, is used as a measure of social memory. There is much less research on long-term social memory than short-term social memory, and no long-term social memory research in female rats. The majority of long-term social discrimination research has relied on long familiarization session of an hour or more and involved juveniles as the stimulus peers. Here we show that a 30-minute familiarization session is sufficient to produce social discrimination 24 h later in both male and female rats and allows for measurement of social approach. Other methodological considerations are described, such as: that age- and sex-matched stimulus peers can be used across a wider range of ages than the use of juveniles; evidence that a familiar peer in a novel location attenuates social discrimination; that the first 10 minutes of the social approach reliably shows a preference for the social peer over an object whereas the 30-minute session does not; and that 10-minute discrimination sessions are preferable to 5-minute sessions. The research satisfies the goal of obtaining an efficient procedure to investigate both the possibility of enhancing or diminishing social approach and social memory with experimental manipulations in both sexes.

Indexed as

Memory, Long-TermRats, Long-EvansSocial DiscriminationAnimalsBehavior, AnimalFemaleMaleRatsSocial Behavior

Identifiers

PMID39570824
PMCPMC11581213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.