Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39570820›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Comparing the impact of contextual associations and statistical regularities in visual search and attention orienting.

Marcus Sefranek, Nahid Zokaei, Dejan Draschkow, Anna C Nobre

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marcus SefranekBrain and Cognition Lab, Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2760-1979
Nahid ZokaeiBrain and Cognition Lab, Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Dejan DraschkowBrain and Cognition Lab, Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Anna C NobreBrain and Cognition Lab, Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 104571
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During visual search, we quickly learn to attend to an object's likely location. Research has shown that this process can be guided by learning target locations based on consistent spatial contextual associations or other statistical regularities. Here, we tested how different types of associations guide learning and the utilisation of established memories for different purposes. Participants learned contextual associations or rule-like statistical regularities that predicted target locations within different scenes. The consequences of this learning for subsequent performance were then evaluated on attention-orienting and memory-recall tasks. Participants demonstrated facilitated attention-orienting and recall performance based on both contextual associations and statistical regularities. Contextual associations facilitated attention orienting with a different time course compared to statistical regularities. Benefits to memory-recall performance depended on the alignment between the learned association or regularity and the recall demands. The distinct patterns of behavioural facilitation by contextual associations and statistical regularities show how different forms of long-term memory may influence neural information processing through different modulatory mechanisms.

Indexed as

AttentionAdultFemaleHumansMaleMental RecallOrientationPhotic StimulationReaction TimeVisual PerceptionYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39570820
PMCPMC11581329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.