ArticlePloS one2024
Effectiveness of percutaneous key lesion endoscopic lumbar decompression for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis in octogenarian patients.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionWith increasing life expectancy, degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) has become a common problem in the geriatric population. LSS reduces the quality of life, limits daily activities, and requires therapeutic aids. We share our experiences of treating octogenarian patients with LSS with key lesion percutaneous single portal endoscopic unilateral laminotomy and bilateral decompression (sEndo-ULBD). MATERIALS AND
methodsNine octogenarian patients who underwent sEndo-ULBD between January 2021 and July 2022 were prospectively enrolled in this study. Their visual analogue score (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), disc height, spondylolisthesis, lumbar lordotic angle, lumbar scoliotic angle, and spinal canal area before and after sEndo-ULBD were followed up for more than six months.
resultsThe VAS score was significantly reduced three months after the operation (p < 0.05). The postoperative ODI scores of all patients improved relative to their preoperative scores; this difference became significant in the third month after the operation (p < 0.05). Index-level disc height did not significantly change after the operation. Spondylolisthesis, lumbar lordotic angle, and lumbar scoliotic angle showed no significant curve progression. The spinal canal area increased markedly after sEndo-ULBD (p <0.05), with no known surgery-related complications.
conclusionsKey lesion sEndo-ULBD was an appropriate, safe, and effective treatment for octogenarian patients suffering from degenerative LSS. With an average follow-up of over one year, we did not find any significant progression in spinal curvature or instability. sEndo-ULBD is an ideal alternative to aggressive fusion fixation lumbar surgery for managing degenerative LSS in octogenarian patients with functional disability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.