Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39570673›Full record

ReviewNucleic acid therapeutics2025

It is Time to Revisit miRNA Therapeutics.

David R Corey

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nucleic acid therapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

David R CoreyDepartments of Pharmacology and Biochemistry, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8973-493X

Funding

Recognition of Cellular Targets by single and double-stranded nucleic acidsR35GM118103 · NIGMS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI David R Corey · 2016 to 2026
$5.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM118103
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recent Nobel Prizes awarded to Ambros and Ruvkun have refocused attention on microRNAs (miRNAs). The importance of miRNAs for basic science has always been clear, but the application to therapy has lagged behind. This delay has been made even more apparent by the accelerating pace of successful programs using duplex RNAs and antisense oligonucleotides to target mRNA. Why has progress been slow? A clear understanding of how miRNAs function in mammalian cells is obscured by the fact that miRNAs can exert their effects through multiple complex mechanisms. This gap in our knowledge has complicated progress in drug discovery. Better insights into the mechanism of miRNAs, more rigorous definitions of miRNAs, and more powerful tools for establishing the physical contacts necessary for miRNA action are now available. These advances lead to a central question for nucleic acid therapy-can miRNAs be productive targets for drug discovery and development?

Indexed as

Genetic TherapyMicroRNAsAnimalsDrug DiscoveryHumansOligonucleotides, AntisenseRNA, MessengerMicroRNAsOligonucleotides, AntisenseRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID39570673
PMCPMC11971554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.