Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39570656›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2024

Presenting and Evaluating a Smartwatch-Based Intervention for Smoking Relapse (StopWatch): Feasibility and Acceptability Study.

Chris Stone, Rosie Essery, Joe Matthews, Felix Naughton, Marcus Munafo, Angela Attwood, Andy Skinner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chris StoneSchool of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9697-9353
Rosie EsserySchool of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2702-6951
Joe MatthewsSchool of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6345-0100
Felix NaughtonAddiction Research Group, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9790-2796
Marcus MunafoSchool of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4049-993X
Angela AttwoodSchool of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3696-4349
Andy SkinnerIntegrative Cancer Epidemiology Programme, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7019-163X

Funding

Medical Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the benefits of smoking cessation, maintaining abstinence during a quit attempt is difficult, and most attempts result in relapse. Innovative, evidence-based methods of preventing relapse are needed. We present a smartwatch-based relapse prevention system that uses passive detection of smoking to trigger just-in-time smoking cessation support.

objectiveThis study aims to evaluate the feasibility of hosting just-in-time smoking cessation support on a smartwatch and the acceptability of the "StopWatch" intervention on this platform.

methodsThe person-based approach for intervention development was used to design the StopWatch smoking relapse prevention intervention. Intervention delivery was triggered by an algorithm identifying hand movements characteristic of smoking from the smartwatch's motion sensors, and the system-generated intervention messages (co-designed by smokers) were delivered on the smartwatch screen. A total of 18 smokers tested the intervention over a 2-week period, and at the end of this period, they provided qualitative feedback on the acceptability of both the intervention and the smartwatch platform.

resultsParticipants reported that the smartwatch intervention increased their awareness of smoking and motivated them to quit. System-generated intervention messages were generally felt to be relevant and timely. There were some challenges with battery life that had implications for intervention adherence, and the bulkiness of the device and the notification style reduced some participants' acceptability of the smartwatch platform.

conclusionsOur findings indicate our smoking relapse prevention intervention and the use of a smartwatch as a platform to host a just-in-time behavior change intervention are both feasible and acceptable to most (12/18, 66%) participants as a relapse prevention intervention, but we identify some concerns around the physical limitations of the smartwatch device. In particular, the bulkiness of the device and the battery capacity present risks to adherence to the intervention and the potential for missed detections. We recommend that a longer-term efficacy trial be carried out as the next step.

Indexed as

Feasibility StudiesSmoking CessationAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CareRecurrenceSecondary PreventionWearable Electronic DevicesJITAIjust-in-time interventionmHealthmobile healthmobile phonepassive detectionrelapserelapse preventionsmartwatchsmokingsmoking cessationwearablewearable technology

Identifiers

PMID39570656
PMCPMC11621715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.