ArticleRevista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social2024
[Risk of postoperative delirium in older adults under balanced general anesthesia].
Article in Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Anesthetic depth can influence the incidence of postoperative delirium (POD). This depth is related to the potency of the volatile anesthetics used to maintain balanced general anesthesia. This potency is measured by means of the minimum alveolar concentration (MAC). In older adults, it is unknown which MAC is associated with the risk of POD. Objective: To estimate the risk of POD associated with minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) levels of volatile anesthetics in older adults who received balanced general anesthesia. Material and methods: A prospective cohort study was carried out with 119 patients, aged ≥ 60 years, with 0 points in the 4 "As" test (4AT), without neurological or psychiatric diseases. During the intraoperative period, the CAM provided was recorded, and in the postoperative period, the presence of emergency with delirium and/or POD was evaluated at 2 and 24 hours, considering a score ≥ 4. Results: A longer hospital stay was found in the group that received a MAC ≥0.9. The incidence of POD was 29.4%. Those who received a MAC ≥ 0.9 had an RR of 2.22 (95%CI: 1.2-4.2) of presenting POD. An adjusted logistic regression model was performed with the variables female sex (OR: 4, 95%CI: 1.5-10.4), ASA physical status 3-4 (OR: 3.7, 95%CI: 1.5-9) and MAC ≥ 0.9 (OR: 3.1 95%CI: 1.2-8) with an R2: 0.26 and a constant of 3.005. Conclusions: MAC ≥ 0.9 represents a risk factor for DPO, so individualized dosing of volatile anesthetics should be used.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.