ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2024
The Impact of HLA-A29 Homozygosity and of the Second HLA-A Allele on Susceptibility and Severity of Birdshot Chorioretinitis.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Impact of ERAP1 and ERAP2 Haplotype Combinations on Susceptibility and Severity of Birdshot Chorioretinitis.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: HLA-A29 is the main susceptibility factor for birdshot chorioretinitis (BSCR). Our study assessed the impact of the second HLA-A allele alongside HLA-A29 on BSCR severity and susceptibility, focusing on HLA-A29 homozygous patients and those with alleles from the HLA-Aw19 group. Methods: We included 120 additional cases to our previous analysis of 286 patients with BSCR, all HLA-A29 positive. Patients were categorized based on the second allele being also HLA-A29 (A29/nonA29 vs. A29/A29) or belonging to the HLA-Aw19 family, including A29, A30, A31, and A33 (A29/nonAw19 vs. A29/Aw19). HLA-A32 was analyzed separately (A29/nonA32 vs. A29/A32). The prevalence of these groups among patients with BSCR was compared with their frequencies in a sample of 151,997 French subjects. Disease severity was approximated by assessing disease onset and visual function at the last visit and was compared between patient groups. Results: When comparing the HLA-A29-positive patients with BSCR to HLA-A29-positive French subjects, we found an overrepresentation of HLA-A29 for the second HLA-A allele (χ² = 4.34; P = 0.037; odds ratio, 1.57; confidence interval, 1.01-2.44). Within the HLA-Aw19 broad antigen family, HLA-A32 was found to be under-represented (χ² = 6.15; P = 0.013; odds ratio, 0.40; confidence interval, 0.19-0.85). The nature of the second HLA-A allele did not impact disease severity. Conclusions: Homozygosity for HLA-A29 increased the risk of developing BSCR without affecting disease severity. The under-representation of HLA-A32 in patients with BSCR suggests a potential protective role.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.