Trial reportJAMA network open2024
Laparoscopic Cytoreduction After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in High-Grade Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A LANCE Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04575935 (Laparoscopic Cytoreduction After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Laparoscopic Cytoreduction After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- The evolving role of open abdominal surgery in gynecological malignancies in the era of minimally invasive and precision oncology.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Review
- Hybrid surgical approach for advanced ovarian cancer: hybrid approach for robotic and minimal open abdominal cytoreduction technique.Obstetrics & gynecology science · 2026Article
- [Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- Minimally invasive versus open interval debulking surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a BMI-stratified analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Transvaginal sonography-guided aspiration of benign ovarian cysts: a retrospective evaluation of safety, feasibility, and economic and environmental implications.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2026Article
- Robotic versus open cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: a propensity score-matched study.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Advanced-Stage Ovarian Cancer: A 10-Year Data Analysis.Cureus · 2026Article
- Roles of minimally invasive techniques in the management of epithelial ovarian cancer (Review).Oncology letters · 2026Review
- Recurrence Patterns After Complete Cytoreduction for Advanced Ovarian Cancer: Robotic Versus Open Surgery.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- Port-site metastases after diagnostic laparoscopy in advanced ovarian cancer: a case report and a systematic review of the literature.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
- Minimally Invasive Surgery in the Management of Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Comprehensive Analysis of Current Evidence and Clinical Applications.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Review
- Minimally invasive surgery in advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer: current evidence and future directions.Current opinion in oncology · 2025Review
- Surgical complexity and scope of procedures necessary after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for primary ovarian cancer.Gynecologic oncology · 2025Article
- Disparities in facility-level adoption of minimally invasive interval debulking surgery for advanced ovarian cancer.Gynecologic oncology · 2025Article
- Minimally invasive surgery in gynecologic oncology: a narrative review of controversies and clinical implications.Gynecology and pelvic medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Despite the absence of high-quality evidence of its safety and effectiveness, minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is increasingly used to treat advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Objective: To assess the feasibility of conducting a full-scale randomized clinical trial (RCT) designed to compare the efficacy of MIS vs laparotomy in patients with advanced-stage EOC and a complete or partial response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Design, Setting, and Participants: This lead-in pilot phase of LANCE (Laparoscopic Cytoreduction After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy), an international, open-label, noninferiority RCT, opened to enrollment in September 2020 and enrolled the 100th eligible patient in February 2023. It was conducted at 11 academic cancer centers in North America and Europe. Participants were adults with stage IIIC or IV epithelial ovarian, fallopian, or primary peritoneal carcinoma who had normal cancer antigen 125 levels and at least a partial radiologic response after 3 to 4 cycles of NACT. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either interval cytoreductive surgery performed using MIS or laparotomy. Data analysis was based on the evaluable population. Interventions: The MIS arm underwent laparoscopic or robotic surgery, vs laparotomy for the control arm. Resection of all visible tumor was attempted, and conversion from MIS to laparotomy was performed when necessary to attain complete resection. Main Outcomes and Measures: Trial feasibility was defined by 3 primary end points: patient accrual rate of at least 5.6 patients per month by the last month of the lead-in pilot phase, conversion from MIS to laparotomy in less than 25% of patients, and a difference in complete gross resection rates of fewer than 20 percentage points between study arms. Results: One hundred women (median [IQR] age, 63 [39-82] years) were included, of whom 49 were randomly assigned to MIS and 51 to laparotomy; 95 were evaluable for surgical outcomes. Most patients (34 [67%] in the laparotomy arm, and 33 [67%] in the MIS arm) had stage IIIC cancer. The monthly accrual rate reached 5.9 patients per month in the final month of the study. Six of 48 evaluable patients (12.5%; 95% CI, 4.7%-25.2%) assigned to MIS underwent conversion to laparotomy. Surgeons achieved a complete gross resection rate in 42 of 48 evaluable patients (88%) assigned to MIS and in 39 of 47 patients (83%) assigned to laparotomy (difference, 4.5 [95% CI, -9.7 to 18.8] percentage points). Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this lead-in pilot study indicated the feasibility of the LANCE RCT to compare the oncological outcomes of MIS vs laparotomy. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04575935.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.