Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39570562›Full record

SynthesisNeuropsychology review2025

Cognitive Intra-individual Variability in Cognitively Healthy APOE ε4 Carriers, Mild Cognitive Impairment, and Alzheimer's Disease: a Meta-analysis.

Stephen L Aita, Victor A Del Bene, Donald L Knapp, Claire E Demming, Vasilios C Ikonomou, Tyler Owen, Ivan A Campbell, Bailey N Wagaman, Nicholas C Borgogna, Joshua E Caron and 2 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neuropsychology review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Cognitive dispersion profiles and prediction of cognitive change in early-onset dementias: Results from LEADS.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Apolipoprotein E Polymorphism and Reproductive Patterns Among Postreproductive Women.American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Stephen L AitaDepartment of Mental Health, VA Maine Healthcare System, Augusta, ME, USA. Stephen.Aita@va.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7201-3247
Victor A Del BeneDepartment of Neurology, University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8562-5071
Donald L KnappDepartment of Psychology, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, USA.
Claire E DemmingDepartment of Psychology, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, USA.
Vasilios C IkonomouDepartment of Psychology, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, USA.
Tyler OwenDepartment of Psychology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Ivan A CampbellDepartment of Psychology, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, USA.
Bailey N WagamanDepartment of Psychology, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, USA.
Nicholas C BorgognaDepartment of Psychology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5085-3656
Joshua E CaronDepartment of Mental Health, VA Maine Healthcare System, Augusta, ME, USA.
Robert M RothDepartment of Psychiatry, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth/DHMC, Hanover, NH, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4374-6569
Benjamin D HillDepartment of Psychology, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5797-5082

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intra-individual variability (IIV) quantifies an individual's scatter in performances across a test battery (dispersion) or across reaction times within a single task (consistency). No studies have meta-analyzed the cross-sectional IIV literature in those with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's dementia (AD). An additional aim of this meta-analysis was to examine IIV in APOE ε4 + healthy control (HC) samples. A systematic search strategy was applied to six databases (Academic Search Complete, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, CINAHL Complete, ERIC, and ProQuest Dissertations & Theses) to identify studies comparing the extent of dispersion- and consistency-based cognitive IIV between clinical (MCI, AD) and HC samples. Thirty-five studies met the inclusion criteria for our random-effects cross-sectional meta-analysis. Hedges' g was used to aggregate between-group effect sizes, with higher positive values indicating clinical > HC IIV. Meta-regression and subgroup-analyses were conducted to evaluate continuous and categorical moderator variables, respectively. Omnibus models yielded analogous moderate-strength, albeit heterogeneous, effects for dispersion and consistency (g = 0.65). Clinical severity was a robust moderator of dispersion (MCI = 0.47, AD = 1.16) and consistency (MCI = 0.51, AD = 1.31) effects. Supplemental analysis of APOE ε4 status in HCs revealed a nonsignificant trend of elevated overall (i.e., dispersion + consistency) IIV in APOE ε4 + vs. APOE ε4 - HC samples (g = 0.24). Cognitive IIV is sensitive to the presence of AD-related genetic risk as well as neurocognitive impairment across the neurocognitive disorder severity spectrum, with a graded-pattern of HC < MCI < AD samples.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseApolipoprotein E4CognitionCognitive DysfunctionIndividualityHeterozygoteHumansNeuropsychological TestsApolipoprotein E4Alzheimer’s dementiaAPOE ε4Intra-individual variabilityMild cognitive impairmentNeurocognition

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.