ReviewJournal of neuro-oncology2025
Immune checkpoint inhibitors for glioblastoma: emerging science, clinical advances, and future directions.
Review in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prevalence of human cytomegalovirus in glioblastoma multiforme: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Pooled it
- A phase I-II study of niacin in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma: safety and interim phase II analysis.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Trial
- Interactions of ACEA and WIN 55,212-2 mesylate with temozolomide and cisplatin in neuroblastoma and glioblastoma cell lines: an isobolographic analysis.Pharmacological reports : PR · 2026Article
- Article
- Advances and challenges in glioblastoma immunotherapy: a meta-analysis of immune checkpoint inhibitors.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Review
- Applications of transcranial focused ultrasound for primary brain tumors.Neuro-oncology advances · 2026Review
- Article
- Dual-Function Lipid-Based Nanovector Strategy for Glioblastoma Immunotherapy: STING Activation and M1 Microglia Polarization.Drug development research · 2026Review
- Glioblastoma radiomics can delineate systemic immune activity states like blood abundance of T cell populations or transcription factors.Journal of neuroinflammation · 2026Article
- A cell death program-based tumor signature stratifies prognosis, immune landscape, and therapeutic response in glioma.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Can tissue immune states shape the risk of hyperprogressive disease?Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Chlorpromazine activates cGAS-STING signaling and reprograms the immune response in glioblastoma.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Antibody therapies in glioblastoma: Overcoming micro-environmental barriers.Iranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2026Review
- Introduction of whole genome sequencing as NHS standard of care for glioma patients in two neurosurgical oncology centres: West Midlands.BJC reports · 2025Article
- Recent advances in oncolytic virus combined immunotherapy in tumor treatment.Genes & diseases · 2025Review
- Predicting bone metastasis and high-grade Gleason scores in prostate cancer: a retrospective study integrating clinical features and magnetic resonance imaging radiomics.Translational andrology and urology · 2025Article
- Review
- CMTM6 drives glioblastoma progression by promoting M2 polarization and suppressing antigen presentation in microglia/macrophages.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Precision synergy: IDH and PARP inhibitors as a dual-target strategy in IDH-mutant glioma treatment.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Article
- Role of cytomegalovirus in glioblastoma development: promoter or culprit?Virology journal · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM), the most common and aggressive primary central nervous system (CNS) tumor in adults, continues to have a dismal prognosis. Across hundreds of clinical trials, few novel approaches have translated to clinical practice while survival has improved by only a few months over the past three decades. Randomized controlled trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), which have seen impressive success for advanced or metastatic extracranial solid tumors, have so far failed to demonstrate a clinical benefit for patients with GBM. This has been secondary to GBM heterogeneity, the unique immunosuppressive CNS microenvironment, immune-evasive strategies by cancer cells, and the rapid evolution of tumor on therapy. This review aims to summarize findings from major clinical trials of ICIs for GBM, review historic failures, and describe currently promising avenues of investigation. We explore the biological mechanisms driving ICI responses, focusing on the role of the tumor microenvironment, immune evasion, and molecular biomarkers. Beyond conventional monotherapy approaches targeting PD-1, PD-L1, CTLA-4, we describe emerging approaches for GBM, such as dual-agent ICIs, and combination of ICIs with oncolytic virotherapy, antigenic peptide vaccines, chimeric antigenic receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, along with nanoparticle-based delivery systems to enhance ICI efficacy. We highlight potential strategies for improving patient selection and treatment personalization, along with real-time, longitudinal monitoring of therapeutic responses through advanced imaging and liquid biopsy techniques. Integrated radiomics, tissue, and plasma-based analyses, may potentially uncover immunotherapeutic response signatures, enabling early, adaptive therapeutic adjustments. By specifically targeting current therapeutic challenges, outcomes for GBM patients may potentially be improved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.