Trial reportAdvances in therapy2025
Real-World Safety and Effectiveness of Dimethyl Fumarate in Patients with MS: Results from the ESTEEM Phase 4 and PROCLAIM Phase 3 Studies with a Focus on Older Patients.
Trial report in Advances in therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multicenter, Global, Observational Study to Collect Information on Safety and to Document the Drug Utilization of Tecfidera™ (Dimethyl Fumarate) When Used in Routine Medical Practice in the Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis (ESTEEM)
An Open-Label Study to Assess the Effects of BG00012 on Lymphocyte Subsets in Subjects With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Effectiveness of Diroximel Fumarate vs. Dimethyl Fumarate in Persons with Multiple Sclerosis: A US Claims Analysis of Relapse Outcomes.Advances in therapy · 2026Article
- The impact of age on efficacy and safety of disease modifying treatment-insights from the Austrian Multiple Sclerosis Treatment Registry.Journal of neurology · 2026Observational
- Comparative Effectiveness and Risk of Severe Infection in Adult Patients With MS Treated With Diroximel Fumarate Versus Anti-CD20 Monoclonal Antibodies: A Real-World Claims Analysis.Advances in therapy · 2026Article
- Repurposed Nrf2 activator dimethyl fumarate rescues muscle inflammation and fibrosis in an aggravated mdx mouse model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy.Redox biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionReal-world studies in the USA report that 41-56% of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) are ≥ 50 years old, yet data on their response to disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) is limited. Dimethyl fumarate (DMF) is an oral DMT approved for treating relapsing MS. This analysis evaluated the safety, efficacy, and immunophenotype changes of DMF in patients ≥ 50 years compared with patients < 50 years.
methodsESTEEM, a 5-year, real-world, observational phase 4 study, assessed the safety and effectiveness of DMF, including treatment-emergent serious adverse events (SAEs) and adverse events (AEs) leading to treatment discontinuation. Absolute lymphocyte counts (ALCs) were recorded from a subset of patients. The PROCLAIM study, a phase 3b interventional study, reported safety outcomes and lymphocyte subset changes in patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) treated with DMF. The study evaluated safety outcomes by analyzing the incidence of SAEs and detailed changes in CD4
resultsESTEEM included 4020 patients aged < 50 years and 1069 aged ≥ 50 years. AEs leading to discontinuation were reported by 19.6% patients < 50 years and 29.6% of patients ≥ 50 years, with gastrointestinal disorders being the most common. SAEs were reported by 5.2% of patients < 50 years and 8.9% those ≥ 50 years. In PROCLAIM, SAEs were reported in 13% of patients < 50 years and 10% of those ≥ 50 years. Median ALC decreased by 35% in patients < 50 years and 50% in those ≥ 50 years in ESTEEM, with similar patterns observed in PROCLAIM.
conclusionsESTEEM found no unexpected safety signals in older patients and annualized relapse rates (ARRs) were significantly reduced in both age groups. Both studies indicated that DMF is efficacious and has a favorable safety profile in patients with RRMS aged ≥ 50 years. CLINICAL
trial registrationESTEEM (NCT02047097), PROCLAIM (NCT02525874).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.