ArticleDermatology and therapy2024
The Atopic Dermatitis Control Tool: Adaptation and Content Validation for Children and Caregivers of Children with Atopic Dermatitis.
Article in Dermatology and therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Concurrence of Atopic Dermatitis and Alopecia Areata: How Common Is It? Why Does It Happen? How Is This Managed Optimally in Clinical Practice?The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology · 2026Review
- Construct validity of the atopic dermatitis control tool in the pediatric population: A prospective study.JAAD international · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe Atopic Dermatitis Control Tool (ADCT) assesses six concepts regarding patient-perceived control of atopic dermatitis (AD) in adults and adolescents with AD. This study aimed to develop two modified ADCT versions, one for children with AD aged 8-11 years and another for caregivers of children with AD aged 6 months to 11 years.
methodsFollowing the US Food and Drug Administration patient-reported outcomes guidance, the ADCT was modified to produce draft Child and Caregiver ADCT versions, maintaining the original six concepts. The instruments were refined and finalized through an iterative process using input from children with AD and caregivers of children with AD via qualitative interviews. Inclusion criteria were clinician diagnosis of AD, prescription treatment use in the past 3 months, and itching/scratching or rash in the past month. Interviews consisted of concept elicitation to identify perceptions of AD control and cognitive debriefing to test and refine the ADCT items.
resultsIn total, 19 children (mean age 9.2 years, 74% male) and 17 caregivers (mean age 36.3 years, 100% female) were interviewed. During concept elicitation, children and caregivers reported similar symptoms and described the cycling and unpredictability of AD. Most participants reported that daily activities were impacted negatively by AD symptoms. The concept of AD control resonated with children and caregivers, and respondents were able to describe their experiences related to AD symptom severity. Children were unfamiliar with the term AD, so the Child ADCT version was named the Child Eczema Control Tool (ECT). Children and caregivers both reported that the instruments assessed relevant concepts, comprehensively measured AD control, and demonstrated content and face validity.
conclusionsThe Child ECT and Caregiver ADCT were developed and qualitatively validated for assessing AD control in patients aged 6 months to 11 years and may offer simple ways to assess disease control and optimize treatment decisions. Video Abstract.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.