ArticleBiochemical genetics2025
Distribution of High-Risk Human Papillomavirus in Self-Collected Cervicalvaginal Samples from the General Malian Population.
Article in Biochemical genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cervical cancer (CC) remains a real public health problem in low- and middle-income countries, where technical resources and competent personnel are insufficient. Persistent cervix infection by high-risk human papillomavirus (Hr-HPV) is the main cause of CC development. In the current study, we examined the distribution of Hr-HPV in the general healthy Malian population using cervicovaginal self- sampling. A total of 354 women were recruited, with a median age of 34 ± 11.37 years, IQR (27-43). We found that 100% of participants agreed to self-sample at the health center. For result announcement 99.2% expressed their preference to be contacted by cell phone. Furthermore, 100% of study participants showed their willingness to undergo confirmatory CC test in case of Hr-HPV test proved positive, and to receive treatment in the event of the presence of cervical lesions. The overall prevalence of Hr-HPV was 21.2% (95% CI: 17-25.8). HPV31/35/33/52/58 with 11.9% (95% CI: 8.7-15.7) and HPV39/68/56/66 with 5.9% (95% CI: 3.7-8.9) were the most common Hr-HPV subtypes. We noted that Hr-HPV genotypes were more prevalent among women under 25 years, 36.1% (N = 61). In addition, the distribution of Hr-HPV was statistically associated with age, W = 12,374, p = 0.015. Our data showed that 25.3% (N = 19) of Hr-HPV-positive women were tested positive by VIA/VILI. Among the 19 VIA/VILI-positive women, histological examination showed that 4 were CIN1, 4 were CIN2, and 2 were CIN3 grades. In addition, the median age of participants with CIN2 and CIN3 was statistically higher than the median of those with CIN1 grade, 25 years IQR (21-26.75) versus 50 years, IQR (40.25-55), W = 24, p = 0.009. In sum, end-users are very satisfied with the cervicovaginal self-sampling device for identifying HR-HPV genotypes as part of CC screening. In addition, it enables hospital practitioners to take the necessary action after triaging women according to their HR-HPV genotype.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39570507What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.