Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39570467›Full record

SynthesisNeurosurgical review2024

Glioblastoma invasion patterns from a clinical perspective-a systematic review.

Veronica Percuoco, Erica Herlin, Francesco Prada, Marco Riva, Federico Pessina, Victor E Staartjes, Giuseppe Maria Della Pepa, Grazia Menna

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Special Issue "Invasion and Metastasis in Brain Cancer".International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Veronica Percuoco *Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland. percuocoveronica@gmail.com.
Erica Herlin *Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan, Via Festa del Perdono, 7, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Francesco PradaFocused Ultrasound Foundation, 1230 Cedars Ct Suite 206, Charlottesville, VA, 22903, USA.
Marco RivaDepartment of Neurosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano Via Alessandro Manzoni, 56, 20089, Rozzano (MI), Italy.
Federico PessinaDepartment of Neurosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano Via Alessandro Manzoni, 56, 20089, Rozzano (MI), Italy.
Victor E StaartjesMachine Intelligence in Clinical Neuroscience & Microsurgical Neuroanatomy (MICN) Laboratory, Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zürich, Switzerland.
Giuseppe Maria Della PepaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Grazia MennaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and aggressive primary brain tumor. Despite advances in treatment, mechanisms underlying GBM invasion remain incompletely understood. This systematic review synthesizes findings from laboratory and clinical studies to elucidate the molecular mechanisms driving GBM invasion and their implications for prognosis and therapy. This review adhered to PRISMA guidelines, conducting a comprehensive search of PubMed/Medline for studies published up to October 16, 2023. Inclusion criteria focused on studies investigating molecular mechanisms of GBM invasiveness with reported clinical outcomes (overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Exclusion criteria included systematic reviews, case reports, small case series, and studies limited to preclinical data. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. From 831 records, 21 studies (2198 patients) met the criteria. Key GBM invasion mechanisms included ECM degradation, vascular invasion, EMT, apoptotic regulation, cytoskeletal organization, and RNA sequencing. Vascular mechanisms were most studied. Bevacizumab resistance linked to poorer outcomes. EMT markers like TWIST and ECM degradation via MMPs such as CD147 correlated with decreased survival. Cytoskeletal and RNA studies highlighted the prognostic significance of tumor subtypes and microenvironmental interactions. This systematic review elucidates the molecular mechanisms underlying GBM invasiveness and their clinical implications. Integrating molecular profiling into routine clinical assessment may enhance prognostic accuracy and therapeutic efficacy, paving the way for personalized treatment strategies.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaNeoplasm InvasivenessHumansPrognosisFunctional patternsGlioblastomaOSOverall survivalPFSPrognosisProgression free survival

Identifiers

PMID39570467
PMCPMC11582338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.