SynthesisNeurosurgical review2024
Glioblastoma invasion patterns from a clinical perspective-a systematic review.
Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- 1-Piperidine Propionic Acid Inhibits PAR2/SerpinB3 Signaling and Reduces Glioblastoma Tumor Aggressiveness.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- The Hallmarks of Glioblastoma: Functional Interplay Between Long Non-Coding RNAs and RNA-Binding Proteins.Cells · 2026Review
- Special Issue "Invasion and Metastasis in Brain Cancer".International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Pharmacological transglutaminase 2 inhibition enhances temozolomide response in patient-derived glioblastoma tumorspheres.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Article
- Tumor-neuronal hybrid programs reveal a spatially adaptive malignant state in glioblastoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Engineering a modular FAP-targeting ferritin-based drug nanocarrier for enhanced glioblastoma theranostics.Theranostics · 2026Article
- An optimized tissue sampling scheme guided by MRI features reveals intratumoral heterogeneity in glioblastoma.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and aggressive primary brain tumor. Despite advances in treatment, mechanisms underlying GBM invasion remain incompletely understood. This systematic review synthesizes findings from laboratory and clinical studies to elucidate the molecular mechanisms driving GBM invasion and their implications for prognosis and therapy. This review adhered to PRISMA guidelines, conducting a comprehensive search of PubMed/Medline for studies published up to October 16, 2023. Inclusion criteria focused on studies investigating molecular mechanisms of GBM invasiveness with reported clinical outcomes (overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Exclusion criteria included systematic reviews, case reports, small case series, and studies limited to preclinical data. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. From 831 records, 21 studies (2198 patients) met the criteria. Key GBM invasion mechanisms included ECM degradation, vascular invasion, EMT, apoptotic regulation, cytoskeletal organization, and RNA sequencing. Vascular mechanisms were most studied. Bevacizumab resistance linked to poorer outcomes. EMT markers like TWIST and ECM degradation via MMPs such as CD147 correlated with decreased survival. Cytoskeletal and RNA studies highlighted the prognostic significance of tumor subtypes and microenvironmental interactions. This systematic review elucidates the molecular mechanisms underlying GBM invasiveness and their clinical implications. Integrating molecular profiling into routine clinical assessment may enhance prognostic accuracy and therapeutic efficacy, paving the way for personalized treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.