Observational studyInternational journal of colorectal disease2024
Clinical outcome and long‑term prognosis after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors in patients aged 75 years or older: a retrospective observational study.
Observational study in International journal of colorectal disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Operative, safety and economic outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection in older adults: a retrospective real-world analysis.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Article
- Clinical Characteristics of Geriatric Patients WithRevista de neurologia · 2026Article
- Predicting post-ESD bleeding in elderly patients with early gastrointestinal cancer: an explainable model based on endoscopic features.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Outcome and Prognostic Factors of Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Patients Aged Over 75 Years.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025Article
- Salvage Surgery After Non-Curative Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Colorectal Cancer: A Comprehensive Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Letter to the Editor regarding "Lymph node yield does not affect the cancer-specific survival of patients with T1 colorectal cancer: a population‑based retrospective study of the U.S. database and a Chinese registry".International journal of colorectal disease · 2025Article
- Reply to the letter to the editor regarding "Clinical outcome and long-term prognosis after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors in patients aged 75 years or older: a retrospective observational study".International journal of colorectal disease · 2025Article
- Letter to the editor regarding "Clinical outcome and long‑term prognosis after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors in patients aged 75 years or older: a retrospective observational study".International journal of colorectal disease · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo determine the clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for colorectal tumors in older patients and predictors of mortality.
methodsWe retrospectively evaluated 207 lesions in 195 consecutive older patients aged ≥ 75 years who underwent ESD for colorectal tumors between January 2007 and December 2018. Outcomes of ESD were evaluated, and the prognosis was assessed in terms of both curability and the patient's baseline physical condition as determined by several indices. Cox regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with reduced overall survival (OS).
resultsTreatment outcomes included a median procedure time of 55 min, en bloc resection rate of 97%, histological en bloc resection rate of 92%, postoperative bleeding rate of 2.4%, and intraoperative perforation rate of 3.4%. Postoperative bleeding and intraoperative perforation could be treated conservatively. Delayed perforation occurred in one patient and required emergency surgery. Three-year OS was 99.4% and 5-year OS was 95.8%. Overall, three patients experienced recurrence (one local, two distant metastasis), and one patient died of primary cancer. Multivariate analysis identified the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score ≥ 3 as the only independent predictor of reduced OS (hazard ratio 4.26; 95% confidence interval 1.60-11.38; P = 0.004).
conclusionOur results suggest that colorectal ESD is safe and effective in older patients aged ≥ 75 years. There was a significant independent association of reduced OS with high CCI score, but not with curability by ESD. The CCI score should be considered when determining the indications for ESD in older patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.