Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39570429›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of colorectal disease2024

Clinical outcome and long‑term prognosis after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors in patients aged 75 years or older: a retrospective observational study.

Naoki Asayama, Shinji Nagata, Kenjiro Shigita, Yoshihiro Mouri, Shintaro Ooie, Kenta Matsumoto, Taiki Aoyama, Akira Fukumoto, Mayumi Kaneko

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of colorectal disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Outcome and Prognostic Factors of Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Patients Aged Over 75 Years.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Naoki AsayamaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima City North Medical Center Asa Citizens Hospital, 2-1-1 Kabeminami, Asakita-Ku, Hiroshima, 731-0293, Japan. asayama0502@asa-hosp.city.hiroshima.jp.
Shinji NagataDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima City North Medical Center Asa Citizens Hospital, 2-1-1 Kabeminami, Asakita-Ku, Hiroshima, 731-0293, Japan.
Kenjiro ShigitaDepartment of Endoscopy, Hiroshima City North Medical Center Asa Citizens Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Yoshihiro MouriDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima City North Medical Center Asa Citizens Hospital, 2-1-1 Kabeminami, Asakita-Ku, Hiroshima, 731-0293, Japan.
Shintaro OoieDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima City North Medical Center Asa Citizens Hospital, 2-1-1 Kabeminami, Asakita-Ku, Hiroshima, 731-0293, Japan.
Kenta MatsumotoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima City North Medical Center Asa Citizens Hospital, 2-1-1 Kabeminami, Asakita-Ku, Hiroshima, 731-0293, Japan.
Taiki AoyamaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima City North Medical Center Asa Citizens Hospital, 2-1-1 Kabeminami, Asakita-Ku, Hiroshima, 731-0293, Japan.
Akira FukumotoDepartment of Endoscopy, Hiroshima City North Medical Center Asa Citizens Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Mayumi KanekoDepartment of Anatomical Pathology, Hiroshima City Asa Citizens Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine the clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for colorectal tumors in older patients and predictors of mortality.

methodsWe retrospectively evaluated 207 lesions in 195 consecutive older patients aged ≥ 75 years who underwent ESD for colorectal tumors between January 2007 and December 2018. Outcomes of ESD were evaluated, and the prognosis was assessed in terms of both curability and the patient's baseline physical condition as determined by several indices. Cox regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with reduced overall survival (OS).

resultsTreatment outcomes included a median procedure time of 55 min, en bloc resection rate of 97%, histological en bloc resection rate of 92%, postoperative bleeding rate of 2.4%, and intraoperative perforation rate of 3.4%. Postoperative bleeding and intraoperative perforation could be treated conservatively. Delayed perforation occurred in one patient and required emergency surgery. Three-year OS was 99.4% and 5-year OS was 95.8%. Overall, three patients experienced recurrence (one local, two distant metastasis), and one patient died of primary cancer. Multivariate analysis identified the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score ≥ 3 as the only independent predictor of reduced OS (hazard ratio 4.26; 95% confidence interval 1.60-11.38; P = 0.004).

conclusionOur results suggest that colorectal ESD is safe and effective in older patients aged ≥ 75 years. There was a significant independent association of reduced OS with high CCI score, but not with curability by ESD. The CCI score should be considered when determining the indications for ESD in older patients.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsEndoscopic Mucosal ResectionAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeCharlson Comorbidity Index scoreColorectal tumorsEndoscopic submucosal dissectionOlder patientsPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID39570429
PMCPMC11582114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.