Observational studyRevista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social2024
[Detection of circulating tumor cells in women with early breast cancer].
Observational study in Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: There are multiple methods and biomarkers with different detection rates to circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in women with breast cancer (BC). However, to the best our knowledge, no study has been carried out to detect CTCs in women with early BC in Mexico. Objective: Calculate the detection rate of CTCs in peripheral blood of Mexican women with early BC by quantification of the relative expression of KRT19, MUC1 and SCGB2A2. Material and methods: Observational, longitudinal, analytical study, which included 62 Mexican women, over 18 years of age, with BC clinical stage 0, I and II. Cells with a density < 1.077 g/ml were isolated from 4 mL of peripheral blood obtained 24 h before surgery, RNAS was extracted and RT-qPCR was performed to quantify the relative expression of KRT19, MUC1 and SCGB2A2. Results: The diagnosis of BC was confirmed in the definitive pathological study in 59 women. 1 case (1.7%), expressed KRT19, 18 cases (30.5%) MUC1, 2 cases (3.4%) SCGB2A2, and 19 cases (32.2%) expressed at least one of the three biomarkers. Conclusions: CTCs detection rates were like those reported in other populations when MUC1 was used, but lower when KRT19 and SCGB2A2 were used. Standardization of blood sample collection and processing, as well as biomarker expression analysis, is important to reduce variability in the detection of CTCs in specific populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.