Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39570414›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2024

Four-year evaluation of neonatal cystic fibrosis screening in Southern Belgium.

M Thimmesch, S Berardis, L Hanssens, C Quentin, F Boemer, G Luis, J P Dewulf, S Marie, L Marcelis, N Lefèvre and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

M ThimmeschDepartment of Pediatric Pulmonology and Cystic Fibrosis, Centre Hospitalier Chrétien MontLégia, Liège, Belgium. matthieu.thimmesch@gmail.com.
S BerardisDepartment of Pediatric Pulmonology and Cystic Fibrosis, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.
L HanssensDepartment of Pediatric Pulmonology and Cystic Fibrosis, Hôpital Universitaire des enfants Reine Fabiola, Brussels, Belgium.
C QuentinDepartment of Pediatric Pulmonology and Cystic Fibrosis, Hôpital Universitaire des enfants Reine Fabiola, Brussels, Belgium.
F BoemerBiochemical Genetics and Newborn Screening Laboratory, Department of Genetics, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège, Liège, Belgium.
G LuisBiochemical Genetics and Newborn Screening Laboratory, Department of Genetics, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège, Liège, Belgium.
J P DewulfBiochemical Genetics and Newborn Screening Laboratory, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.
S MarieBiochemical Genetics and Newborn Screening Laboratory, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.
L MarcelisLaboratory of Pediatric Research - Brussels Newborn Screening Center, Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
N LefèvreDepartment of Pediatric Pulmonology and Cystic Fibrosis, Hôpital Universitaire des enfants Reine Fabiola, Brussels, Belgium.
C LibioulleMolecular biology laboratory, Department of Genetics, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège, Liège, Belgium.
V DidebergMolecular biology laboratory, Department of Genetics, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège, Liège, Belgium.
M PhilippeauMolecular biology laboratory, Center for Human Genetics, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.
N RevencuCenter for Human Genetics, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.
H BoboliDepartment of Pediatric Pulmonology and Cystic Fibrosis, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège, Liège, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis (CF-NBS) using an IRT-DNA algorithm with a 12 CFTR-variant panel and an IRT/IRT failsafe was officially implemented in the French-speaking Community of Belgium in January 2020. This screening protocol was evaluated after 4 years according to the criteria defined by the European Cystic Fibrosis Society's working group on neonatal screening. Immunoreactive trypsinogen concentration (IRT) was measured on dried blood spots collected between the second and the fourth day of life. CFTR variants genotyping was initiated when IRT ≥ 99th percentile (P99). If at least 1 variant was identified, the child was referred to a CF center for a sweat test (ST). If IRT ≥ 99.9th percentile with no variant identified, a failsafe was provided with IRT repeated on day 21 and subsequent ST in case of persistent IRT > P99. Extensive Gene Analysis was initiated if sweat chloride level was ≥ 30 mmol/L. Over a period of 4 years, 212.979 newborns were screened. Forty-two were diagnosed with CF: 34 by CF-NBS, 3 following a meconium ileus, 3 by family history and 2 missed cases. Additionally, 112 healthy carriers and 14 CFSPID were identified. The median age at the first consultation was 23 days. The sensitivity of our CF-NBS is 95% (target ≥ 95%), the positive predictive value 18% (target ≥ 30%) and CF/CFSPID ratio 2.8.

conclusionAlthough follow-up is limited, this first evaluation demonstrates encouraging sensitivity and early management before one month of age. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis improves the prognosis of patients. WHAT IS NEW: • This article presents an initial assessment of our screening after 4 years.

Indexed as

Cystic FibrosisCystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance RegulatorNeonatal ScreeningAlgorithmsBelgiumFemaleGenetic TestingGenotypeHumansInfant, NewbornMaleSweatTrypsinogenCFTR protein, humanCystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance RegulatorTrypsinogenCystic fibrosisImmunoreactive trypsinogenNewborn screening

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.