ReviewEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2025
Leveraging machine learning in limited sampling strategies for efficient estimation of the area under the curve in pharmacokinetic analysis: a review.
Review in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Model-Informed Precision Dosing in Pediatric Patients: Current Software Tools and Bedside Guided Application.Paediatric drugs · 2026Pooled it
- Limited Sampling Strategies to Estimate the Exposition of Different Lipid Nanocaspules.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveLimited sampling strategies are widely employed in clinical practice to minimize the number of blood samples required for the accurate area under the curve calculations, as obtaining these samples can be costly and challenging. Traditionally, the maximum a posteriori Bayesian estimation has been the standard method for the area under the curve estimation based on limited samples. However, machine learning is emerging as a promising alternative for this purpose. Here, we review studies that utilize machine learning approaches to develop limited sampling strategies and compare the strengths and weaknesses of these machine learning methods.
methodsWe searched the literature for studies that used machine learning to estimate the area under the curve using a limited sampling strategy approach.
resultsWe identified ten studies that developed machine learning models to estimate the area under the curve for six different drugs. Several of these models demonstrated good accuracy and precision in area under the curve estimation in reference to the traditional Bayesian approach, highlighting the potential of machine learning models in precision dosing.
conclusionsDespite these promising early results, the development of machine learning for limited sampling strategies is still in its early stages. Further research might be needed to validate machine learning models with larger, high-quality clinical datasets to ensure their reliability and applicability in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39570408What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.