Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39570408›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2025

Leveraging machine learning in limited sampling strategies for efficient estimation of the area under the curve in pharmacokinetic analysis: a review.

Abdullah Alsultan, Abdullah Aljutayli, Abdulrhman Aljouie, Ahmed Albassam, Jean-Baptiste Woillard

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Limited Sampling Strategies to Estimate the Exposition of Different Lipid Nanocaspules.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Abdullah AlsultanDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. absultan@ksu.edu.sa.
Abdullah AljutayliDepartment of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, Qassim University, Buraydah, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulrhman AljouieDepartment of Data Management, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ahmed AlbassamDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia.
Jean-Baptiste WoillardINSERM U1248 P&T, University of Limoges, 2 Rue du Pr Descottes, 87000, Limoges, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveLimited sampling strategies are widely employed in clinical practice to minimize the number of blood samples required for the accurate area under the curve calculations, as obtaining these samples can be costly and challenging. Traditionally, the maximum a posteriori Bayesian estimation has been the standard method for the area under the curve estimation based on limited samples. However, machine learning is emerging as a promising alternative for this purpose. Here, we review studies that utilize machine learning approaches to develop limited sampling strategies and compare the strengths and weaknesses of these machine learning methods.

methodsWe searched the literature for studies that used machine learning to estimate the area under the curve using a limited sampling strategy approach.

resultsWe identified ten studies that developed machine learning models to estimate the area under the curve for six different drugs. Several of these models demonstrated good accuracy and precision in area under the curve estimation in reference to the traditional Bayesian approach, highlighting the potential of machine learning models in precision dosing.

conclusionsDespite these promising early results, the development of machine learning for limited sampling strategies is still in its early stages. Further research might be needed to validate machine learning models with larger, high-quality clinical datasets to ensure their reliability and applicability in clinical settings.

Indexed as

Area Under CurveBayes TheoremMachine LearningPharmacokineticsHumansModels, BiologicalArea under the curveArtificial intelligenceBayesian pharmacokineticsLimited sampling strategyMachine learning

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.