ReviewAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2025
Latest trends in the environmental analysis of PFAS including nontarget analysis and EOF-, AOF-, and TOP-based methodologies.
Review in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Occurrence and Treatment Technologies of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in Electroplating Wastewater: A Review.Toxics · 2026Review
- Assessing PFAS total in landfill leachate through multiple extraction methods and fluorine mass balance.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Analysis and fate of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in the global aquatic environment: perspectives and combined risks with microplastics.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Review
- The hidden fluorine: a critical review of analytical methods for unmasking PFAS and closing fluorine mass balance in environmental samples.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Review
- Navigating per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in organic waste streams: Sources, challenges and implications for circular economy recycling - A mini-review.Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA · 2026Review
- Evaluation and comparison of tools used to quantify aggregate PFAS exposure: Extractable organic fluorine, PFAS burden scores and summed PFAS concentrations.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2025Article
- Optimization and Testing of an SPE-LC/q-TOF Analytical Method for the Detection of PFAS Degradation Products in Water Treatment Processes.Environmental science & technology · 2025Article
- Nontarget and Suspect Screening of Fluorinated Ionic Liquids and PFAS in European Wastewaters Using Supercritical Fluid Chromatography.Environmental science & technology · 2025Article
- Managing PFAS in Sewage Sludge: Exposure Pathways, Impacts, and Treatment Innovations.Journal of xenobiotics · 2025Review
- Biosolids in Washington State: Putting per- and poly-fluorinated alkyl substances concerns into a real-world context.Journal of environmental qualityArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ubiquitous environmental occurrence of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) underscores the critical need to broaden investigative efforts in effective screening, risk assessment, and remediation. Owing to the broad spectrum of PFAS, various analytical techniques have been extensively utilized to attain inclusivity, with notable attention given to methods such as extractable organic fluorine (EOF), adsorbable organic fluorine (AOF), and the total oxidizable precursor (TOP) assay. These techniques expand the scope of PFAS analysis by estimating perfluoroalkyl acid precursors or the total organochlorine fraction. This review offers a comprehensive comparative overview of up-to-date methodologies, alongside acknowledging the inherent limitations associated with their applications. When coupled with target analysis via low-resolution tandem mass spectrometry, these techniques offer a potential estimation of total PFAS concentrations. Yet, analytical challenges such as the limited availability of reference analytical standards, partial PFAS adsorption, and the entrapment of fluorinated inorganic anions on adsorbent materials often restrict the comprehensiveness of PFAS analysis. So, integrating nontarget analysis using high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) tools fortifies these PFAS mass balance approaches, enabling the development of a more holistic approach for an environmental analysis framework. This review provides additional insights into the comparative advantages of PFAS analytical approaches and explores various data prioritization strategies in nontarget screening methods. It advocates for the necessary optimization of PFAS extraction methods, asserting that integrating the nontarget approach would foster the establishment of a comprehensive monitoring framework across diverse environmental matrices. Such integration holds promise for enhancing scientific comprehension of PFAS contamination across diverse environmental matrices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39570388What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.