ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2024
Evaluation of uterocervical angle in intrauterine device displacement cases.
Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Strangulated Small Bowel Obstruction Caused by a Migrated Ring-Shaped Intrauterine Device: Two Case Reports and a Literature Review.The American journal of case reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIntrauterine device is one of the most preferred birth control method in the world. Being able to predict that the intrauterine device will not dislocate is very important in terms of preventing unwanted pregnancies. Here, we evaluated the role of uterocervical angle in displacement of intrauterine device and to determine whether it has a discriminative role for displacement.
methodsThis cross-sectional case-control study was conducted at an obstetrics and gynecology clinic of a university-affiliated training and research hospital. A total of 108 patients between June 2021 and September 2021 were included. While 36 patients in the case group had intrauterine device displacement, 72 patients in the control group had normal intracavitary intrauterine device detected under transvaginal ultrasound. Demographic characteristics, parameters related to intrauterine device and uterus were recorded. Uterocervical angle was measured in all the patients.
resultsThere was no statistically significant difference in terms of sociodemographic features, parameters related to uterus size and intrauterine device. The median uterocervical angle was significantly higher in intrauterine device displacement group as compared to controls [159.5 (90-177) vs 146 (118-169) degrees, p < 0.001)]. Uterocervical angle > 156 degree discriminates intrauterine device displacement with 66.67% sensitivity and 80.56% specificity (AUC = 0.763).
conclusionA larger uterocervical angle may suggest an increased likelihood of intrauterine device displacement. Thus, uterocervical angle seems to have a potential to play a crucial role in the monitoring and management of intrauterine device users even in patients with similar sized uterus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39570386What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.