ArticleNeurosurgical review2024
Characteristics and outcome of patients requiring Decompressive Craniectomy for Traumatic Brain Injury: a retrospective analysis.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decompressive Craniectomy for Intracranial Pathologies in the Intensive Care Unit : Effects on Mortality and Clinical Course.Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2026Article
- The impact of glasgow outcome scale - extended cut-point of dichotomization on factors associated with outcomes in traumatic brain injury research.Neurosurgical review · 2025Article
- Characteristics and recovery trends of severe TBI patients with a favorable functional outcome at 6-month follow-up.Neurosurgical review · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brain swelling after Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) can elevate intracranial pressure, necessitating Decompressive Craniectomy (DC) as the preferred surgical intervention. This study aimed to analyze a large institutional database to identify clinical characteristics of patients requiring primary DC and their outcomes. We reviewed TBI patients admitted to our center from 2015 to 2021, utilizing a prospectively maintained registry. Data collected included demographics, injury mechanisms, admission findings, neuroimaging results, DC necessity, procedures during hospitalization, and functional outcomes at discharge and six-month follow-up. A total of 4,011 patients were analyzed, with 506 undergoing primary DC. Factors such as International Normalized Ratio, activated Partial Thromboplastin Time, subdural hematoma, midline shift, epidural hematoma, intracerebral hemorrhage, and the presence of compressed or absent basal cisterns were independently linked to the need for DC. Additionally, the requirement for DC correlated with an increased likelihood of tracheostomy. For patients requiring DC, older age, lower hemoglobin levels, higher Rotterdam scores, and the presence of compressed or absent basal cisterns were associated with unfavorable outcomes in mild to moderate TBI cases. In severe TBI patients, lower Glasgow Coma Scale scores and fixed pupils were linked to poor outcomes. This study represents one of the most comprehensive analyses of primary DC requirements and outcomes, revealing that the need for DC is associated with worse outcomes in TBI patients and identifying several independent predictors of outcomes across varying severity levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39570316What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.